Search results

I'm talking about Israelites in general. Those who descend from the ancient nation of Israel. We're talking about something relating to salvation, which is an individual thing and not a corporate or national thing.

I have no problem with His Word whatsoever. I have a problem with how you interpret some of it. You are not thinking here. It says there would be 69 weeks up to the appearance of Messiah the Prince, so how do you have His ministry within the 69th week when it says He would appear after the...

That's right. So, ask Him for wisdom about this (James 1:5-7). LOL! Excuse me for not knowing that you are one of the rare ones who doesn't believe that. What is your understanding of their duration then? Why isn't it ridiculous to you then? No, you do! Should we just do this over and over...

Are you suggesting that the blood of Christ has not been effective for Israel for the past almost 2,000 years?

I have already explained that and you still don't get it. What else can I do? I have nothing to add to what I've already said, so if you can't understand what I'm saying then we just have to agree to disagree. That's where you go wrong. He's not talking about that. He's talking about what is...

LOL. What is wrong with your reading comprehension skills? Are you even trying here? Nowhere did I say that "it discusses the old covenant after the week was confirmed". Hello? Daniel 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the...

I honestly couldn't care less if I'm making sense to you or not. You're not making sense to me. LOL. So, somehow the first 69 weeks are all 7 years in duration, but then the 70th week refers to the whole New Testament time period? Ridiculous. When He confirmed the new covenant He made the old...

Oh, I get it, alright. I get that you are not even willing to use scripture to interpret scripture by seeing that Daniel 9:27 refers to the same thing that Hebrews 10 is talking about. Nonsense. Why would you not think that a scripture referring to the confirming of the new covenant would not...

Yes, He was. You misunderstand. The text from Daniel 9:27 fits perfectly with this.... Hebrews 10:8 Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law; 9 Then said he, Lo, I come to...

Look at the post again. I added something to it after you quoted what I said before editing the post. Daniel 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of...

Read the text more carefully. It's talking about PEOPLE teaching you to "know the Lord". But, when you have the Holy Spirit in you, then you don't need PEOPLE to teach you that anymore since the Holy Spirit is teaching you. With that said, don't confuse this with me saying that no one has the...

In no way, shape or form am I saying that. You just proved what I said. I said you can't understand spiritual things and that's why you can't understand what I'm saying which comes from scripture. Where did I say anything about evangelism no longer being necessary? Nowhere. I'm talking about...

Of course I agree with this. I disagree because the old covenant sacrifices and offerings didn't become obsolete until the midst or middle of the 70th week, not at the beginning. So, you can't have His death at the beginning of the 70th week. But, at least you actually have Him being cut off...

Not quite. Upon His death His spirit went to God because He committed His spirit to God upon His death. Luke 23:46 Jesus called out with a loud voice, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit.” When he had said this, he breathed his last. Correct. So, you need to differentiate between His...

No, I'm saying that "us" includes himself and all of those he was writing to, which were the seven churches that included Gentile believers. That's not who he was writing to, though, so how can they be the "us" that he was referring to? The "us" would include him and the ones he was writing to...

So, what in the world are you even arguing about then because that has been my point the whole time. God doesn't have different plans for Jews than He does for Gentiles. His plan is for all Jews and Gentiles to have the opportunity to be part of the church. What is replacement theology exactly...

Are you afraid of tribulation and hope to avoid it? So much for you having any spiritual discernment. That's how carnal people think. Acts 14:22 Confirming the souls of the disciples, and exhorting them to continue in the faith, and that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom...

I could not care less what you find to be acceptable. You too are dishonest in the way you treat that same verse. It's not and you most certainly do NOTHING to prove otherwise. NONSENSE! This is as dishonest as it gets. You are trying to change the meaning of the word "after". It does NOT mean...

Your reading comprehension skills have failed you yet again. I was not talking about Daniel 9:27. You were talking about when the Messiah is cut off in relation to the first 69 weeks and saying He was cut off at the end of the 69th week. No, it says He would be cut off AFTER the end of the 69th...

So, I guess context means nothing to you. Doesn't matter to you if He was talking about going to heaven bodily or not.