One thing about Trump is ...he chooses his words carefully and there are messages in what he says.
Example: during the beginning of the covid mess, he was asked what he planned to do and he said several things, but over and over he said, "You'll see! You'll see!" And then he implemented "Operation Warp Speed" to fast track vaccinations, and thus, helped murder thousands or more people with pushing propaganda and mandates around the jab. He "speaks dark sayings." It's the same way he loves quoting "the snake " poem ....he is gloating over his followers every time he quotes it.
Who dictated that people take the vaccine? I don't think Trump ever commanded that people take the vaccine. Biden did. So did many other leaders in Europe. But not Trump.
Think about this for a moment. What was the real danger? Covid-19? Not really. The real danger to the United States and the world was unemployment and the starvation and death that would follow. How many people died of the disease? How many people died of the Vaccine?
During that challenging period, a significant number of individuals succumbed to both the disease and the associated complications. However, one can't help but wonder how many additional lives would have been lost if the nation had chosen to implement a prolonged shutdown. It's important to consider the broader implications of such a decision: ships were forbidden from docking in American ports, leaving many vessels floating offshore, unable to unload essential supplies. This disruption resulted in critical supply lines being severed, causing grocery store shelves to dwindle and leading to widespread shortages of vital goods.
As a result, panic set in among the population, who rushed to stockpile items, exacerbating the scarcity. The World Health Organization (WHO) predicted millions of potential fatalities, a grim scenario frequently associated with economies that abruptly come to a halt. Grocery stores are typically stocked with only about a week's worth of food, emphasizing the fragility of our supply chain. In this context, the threat posed by the disease may not have been as immediate or profound as the dangers stemming from a lack of food, medicine, fuel, and warmth—essentials for survival. The delicate balance between public health and the economy became acutely evident as communities grappled with these pressing concerns.
In a bold move to safeguard the well-being of the nation, the President initiated "Project Warpspeed," a comprehensive plan aimed at ensuring the survival of the population amid escalating crises. The potential for widespread panic loomed large, threatening to devastate communities and disrupt society on a global scale. Recognizing the urgent need for action, the President implemented strategies that enabled companies to resume operations, thereby restoring a sense of normalcy and continuity in people's lives.
In this turbulent landscape, however, there emerged a troubling narrative. Some allege that it was Dr. Fauci, along with the National Institutes of Health, who seized this tumultuous opportunity to further a sinister agenda involving a bioweapon. This perspective raises serious ethical questions regarding the motivations behind certain public health measures and the implications for individual safety and trust in health authorities. The intersection of public health and governmental power has become a focal point of intense debate, highlighting the complexities of navigating crises in a manner that prioritizes both safety and transparency.
You might also recall President Trump's recommendation of Ivermectin and other medicines.