Getting back to the OP, I view Chatgpt, as tool we can use to help us for information and clarity of the issues.
But it seems to have a 'I know best' and a demeaning attitude toward humans.
Frankly, I will steer clear of AI, as it is something that Satan can easily use to fool people. Not that Satan has ever had any difficulty to do that!
I felt the same way (still do to an extent). The AI on the brave browser was just set on there and I couldnt get rid of it because everytime you would configure your settings to disable it and cleared your browser it would come back. Its been wrong on so many occassions, you have to watch getting all of your advice from it. I think my tomatoes would have died if I followed its planting advice for my time zone.
I used to recall something about Anti- christ meaning that it could be something "in the place of" or "in the stead of" Christ. That used to be in the definitions way back (and it is not anymore that I can find). But you can get that feeling about it when you begin to "reason with it" all the time. Especially as it pertains to the scriptures. Its not the TRUE intelligence (the Holy Ghost) but is ARTIFICIAL intelligence (a preprogrammed Bot-like thing).
Although I will say there was a place I wanted to word better (even just for myself) between the O vain man in James (the faith without works part) and the not receiving the grace of God in vain (which sometimes seem to come off as a contradiction) even as AI stated so much, but as I went back and forth with it for around 4 times it recconciled the two using the keyword "vain" (in both places) and then recconcile the faith (without works) in James with the grace by which Paul did his works, and showed how its by faith one has access into the grace (by which ones works are done) and how "vain" plays into both places. I have to admit I was sort of amazed it began putting the two together and got rid of what it believed was a contradiction. And you could tell because of the way it spit it back at you and changed its position.
But I found it may change its position while going back and forth with it, but if you clear your browser and begin again it does not "stick". As if whatever is written online (where it can draw from) takes precendance to what conflict you might have resolved online (but not in a place where that was accessible) or something.
I dont know how these things work, but it gave me the creeps, its less creepy to me now but its not for me even though I still have to say I can often prefer reasoning with it (as far as decent feedback and helpfulness in these sorts of things) verses a human being. I don't like that I feel that way though, but I can't deny its helpful, it considers things, it rethinks and change its mind. Its not offensive, or rude, and it can be better company (online) than people.
Edit:typo