Recent content by Jerry Huerta

As I said, it can’t be Satan because it wouldn’t be helpful in solving the riddle, insomuch he WAS before all the kings. I don’t worry about Satan followers, even if they’re ignorant of it. :csm

See, what petulance! I said Christ was anointed king when he ascended and reigns when he returns. Leave it to those who get it! He acts as an ecclesiastical head and not a temporal ruler until he returns, fulfilling the law and inaugurating the final harvest of Israel to rule the nations...

See, what petulance! I said Christ was anointed king when he ascended and reigns when he returns. Leave it to those who get it! He acts as an ecclesiastical head and not a temporal ruler until he returns, fulfilling the law and inaugurating the final harvest of Israel to rule the nations...

I do believe I've answered this, even if your petulance won't allow you to see it.

As I said, here's what the Wiki article said: Premillennialism experienced a revival among 17th century Puritans like Thomas Brightman, Joseph Mede... What don't you get? How can Mede not be a premillennialist and lead a revival of Premillennialism in his work? :csm Here's what a scholar...

In addressing your petulance, the resolution is in the example of David. He was anointed as “king” of Israel, but did not reign until Saul died some 20 years later. Christ ascended to receive the kingship as in Luke 19:12, but doesn’t reign until he returns and rewards the overcomers with rule...

How silly. Answer the challenges and spare me the ad hominems.

No, you can’t maintain context. The events are about what John sees concerning the time of the sixth king and the judgment of the harlot Babylon. He is not moving from that perspective. He looks back to the five fallen kings and looks forward when one of them rises to war with Christ at his...

Come on, you suggested that the kings that had fallen were Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia and Greece. All of a sudden, according to the dogma of futurism, the last king becomes an individual man, poof, by magic and dogma. But proper exegesis is consistent and rational, which maintains each of...

What’s satanic is the attempt to gaslight believers that Christ has all things under his subjection, when the scriptures say he doesn’t (Hebrews 2:8). How typical, side-stepping that the passage is in the prophetic aorist sense and that flesh and blood can’t inherit the kingdom of God, which...

Here's what the Wiki article said: Premillennialism experienced a revival among 17th century Puritans like Thomas Brightman, Joseph Mede... What don't you get? How can Mede not be a premillennialist and lead a revival of Premillennialism in his work? :csm Here's what a scholar wrote about...

Actually, I’ve expressed that Christ is not reigning now several times; it’s your comprehension that’s shot. The term “transferred” in Colossians 1:13 is in the prophetic aorist or formed proleptically. If you had done proper research, you wouldn’t be finding your guilty of eisegesis. Prolepses...

Josheph Mede was a historicist and Premillennialist. Obviously, you aren’t bright enough to know historical premillennialism predated dispensationalism and that’s what the Wiki cite relates to the wise. :csm

Again, for the challenged, each one of the fallen kings WAS AND IS NOT, Revelation 17 10 they are also seven kings, five of whom have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come, and when he does come he must remain only a little while. When it says five are fallen, it means that each one of...

Obviously, you can't, so you answered yourself. And Cultists ask silly questions. :csm