Why when Christ Himself appointed Peter head of the church in His absence???
Peter is the prince of the apostles, head of the universal church on earth!Jn 20:21-23
(Acts 20:28 Jn 21:17 Heb 13:17)
Much of what you wrote is related to the Catholic Church's worship of Peter.
Im not a Catholic, and i dont recognize Peter as anything but a born again, one of the 11.
Peter is not the Rock that the Church is built upon.
Its the revelation that Peter recognized, that is the Rock, and that is Christ, the head of the Church , the Cornerstone of the Chruch and the Savior of All who will believe.
If any of the Apostles could qualify as a pope, it would not be Peter, as he was not even aware that Gentiles could be saved, till about 12 yrs after Jesus was back in Heaven. Go and read Acts 10.
However PAUL, who wrote all the church doctrine, and most of the NT< should be the obvious choice to turn into an Idol, as he did most of the work that became the New Testament.
Yet the CC omit Paul, and stuck with Peter, who is really way behind the curve until he's really old.
He was such a weak believer that Paul had to call him out and make him stop behaving around Jews as if He was not born again.
Thats "Peter"... he is anything but the "rock" that founded the Body of Christ.
As a matter of fact, it was PETER< who said that Paul's Letters, were equal to the TORAH...... in the time of Paul and Peter.
So, Peter recognized Paul's mighty anointing, which corresponds to Paul stating that he did more then all the other apostle's combined.
Now isn't it odd that the CC, would ignore Paul, and make an Idol out of the one that recognized Paul?
Sad, but true.