I did see those posts. I "liked" them too.
I agree 9/11 was not only evil but was not as it appeared when the towers came down. I watched a video taken by people who were across the river in NJ when they collapsed.
I've always liked to watch the intricacy involved in controlled demolition.
Watching that video one couldn't help but hear the layer of blasts detonating level by level and then the towers collapsed exactly in the same manner as that which occurs in CD.
The collapse of Building 7 well after the towers was definitely suspect.
Had it not been for that CD the towers would have held even with planes having crashed into the upper structure.
I know someone who responded to the PA field where flight 93 in Shanksville, PA. No debris. No fuselage. Wing pieces. Nothing! The flight was blasted out of airspace and as good as evaporated due to the impact of the rockets.
It is thought the hijackers were heading to any one of the five active nuclear power plants in the trajectory of their flight path at the time the hijack was discovered. Hence, why the flight was vaporized.
One doesn't do damage to NPP's if they strike the towers. They do do irrevocable damage if they impact the cooling system/towers that lead to the reactor core.
The Sunday Times: NUCLEAR MYSTERY: Crashed plane's target may have been a reactor, also: today's CNN nuclear report is nearly excellent (with comments by Russell Hoffman, October 20th, 2001)
I saw a video of the Pentagon "flight" impact too. Again, no tail section, no wings, no debris of a flight on site.
With regard to the Twin's, the owner, who now still owns the rebuilt structure near Ground Zero, was made aware he needed to commit to huge refitting and repairs of the towers. And at a cost of many millions.
Not anymore. Now he has a new property that is enormous. And the footprint of the towers and Building 7 were cleared to make way for its construction. Not at his expense.
And the aftermath? The United States Patriot Act, the National Defense Authorization Act, CC's installed all over the city. Restrictions on free travel, which has always been government controlled, as is communications, surveillance of our Internet emails and activities.
Later? The introduction of home surveillance at our expense. The Samsung "Smart TV" eavesdrops on the homes where it is installed. Samsung admitted this years after it was introduced and due to so many people revealing that little detail about its smart technology. What good is audio without video? Likely that too.
Then we have Amazon's invention, Alexa! Voice activated, expanding as we speak to serve in other areas of our private lives as well. It too eavesdrops on our homes, if installed.
Years ago I was lurking at a forum. A member there posted about an Alexa experience one of their friends had.
The person had received a call telling her that her mom had died. The woman naturally was beside herself and openly grieving when she said all of the sudden the Alexa voice spoke aloud and said,
it'll be alright! 
She'd said she was so stunned to hear a voice speak out when she was home alone that she stopped crying and realized it was the Alexa system independently comforting her.
No privacy! Government and others surveillance of even our private homes. All in the interest of national security? Or national population controls?
Now there's "The Mirror" workout system. You don't just buy that thing and its shipped for you to install. Nope, you have to schedule one of the company tech's to install it. Anything that is voice activated is able to hear you at any time when you speak in any way in your home or office. And the two way mirror system is just one vertical window of surveillance too.
Our phones track us, EZPass keeps a record of our travel, as do the new cars systems. And On-Star and its like are able to not only eavesdrop on us but, is also able to control our vehicle.
On-Star had a commercial out for a short while until they realized they were telling us we weren't really in full control of our own cars. This was to make people feel secure. Right.
A car was seen being driven to the shoulder of the road as sirens blasted in the background and the On-Star operator was heard speaking to the car owner. Telling them their carjacked vehicle had been located, through GPS, and the OS system was now slowing the vehicle and safely pulling it to the shoulder, locking the doors, so that the perpetrators could not escape before police arrived.
Oh boy, where can I get a car like that? NOT!
911, notice the date? The national emergency phone number. The planes hijacked? United and America. United America. American United. Symbolism is big amid those who formed America from its inception.
Right after 911 a Texas sheriff held a news conference where he also said he believed every home in America should have a government monitored surveillance system installed. This to preclude terrorists from making another attack.
How stupid.
You first sheriff. :)
Now, that's happening. And government isn't drafting a law to make it happen and they're not funding it. We're buying into it, if we're that silly, thinking it makes our lives easier.
I'm here to say, the day I need to say, "Alexa, fill cooking pot with a quart of water", is the day someone better take my temperature.
If I'm too lazy to do that, something is very wrong.
OK, I think I've screeded enough.
I should have started out with, don't get me started... but that would have been redundant.
