He hadn’t realized yet he no longer had to be a man pleaser.
Who knows what all was going on there. It wasn't just Paul that received a message, it was Peter too.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
He hadn’t realized yet he no longer had to be a man pleaser.
Ummm... Who's talking about the laws of Moses? I'm talking about the laws of God. The moral law that more or less forms the basis of foundation of every culture and government on the planet. And the law which forms the foundation to God's throne and upon which His kingdom stands. Moses had nothing to do with it but merely the bloke who carried it down the mountain.Before you call people liars you might consider reading the Bible every once in a while.
Galatians 2:11-21
“But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For prior to the coming of certain men from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he began to withdraw and hold himself aloof, fearingthe party of the circumcision. The rest of the Jews joined him in hypocrisy, with the result that even Barnabas was carried away by their hypocrisy. But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas in the presence of all, If you, being a Jew, live like the Gentiles and not like the Jews, how is it that you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews? We are Jews by nature and not sinners from among the Gentiles; nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified. But if, while seeking to be justified in Christ, we ourselves have also been found sinners, is Christ then a minister of sin? May it never be! For if I rebuild what I have once destroyed, I prove myself to be a transgressor. For through the Law I died to the Law, so that I might live to God. I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me. I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.”
Paul did not challenge Peter at all. that's a lie ! and work of Satan. it's made up gibberish, twisting the story.
If Paul was challenging Peter, Peter would of had Challenged him on the subject.
All that Paul was doing was setting the example forward and Peter did not challenge such at all.
Any true Jew follows all of the OT and any worthy Christian knows that the OT is a Blueprint for the NT.
Sadly some try and split the two and make out some pathetic race thing of the Goyim and the Jews being two clean different people, but the fact remains that the two are as one "under true Christianity" and it's only they who are not true Christians that make up this lie about two, the Jews still insist such as do all Atheist peddle this point and this is because they are ignorant of the fact. because they are rejecting Christ.
All under True Christianity are as one and anyone who claims otherwise is of Satan.
Any Jew who goes outside of the OT Books that we have in our Bible is not a Jew at all, but is of Satan for sure if they add to the OT and that condemns the Talmud totally and there so called Zionist lackey dogs, there is no hope for them so called Jews because they are not supporting Holy Moses at all in fact or the OT but have made up their own Idols just like that bastard Golden Calf that such Satanist created and tried to kill Holy Moses.
Jews are not for today, they who were worthy became Christians 2000 years ago.
No one is worthy of God unless you are born again.
God does not bring the unrepentant back into his arms, ever, that is Satans doing !
But nowadays Satanic clowns are claiming that he some how will, because of the bastard State that was created by Satanist in fact. if that were the case, God would have to say sorry to Sodom and Gomorrah and for Jesus Christ as well, as why would God do such a thing ? by bring back unrepentant idiots.![]()
Ummm... Who's talking about the laws of Moses? I'm talking about the laws of God. The moral law that more or less forms the basis of foundation of every culture and government on the planet. And the law which forms the foundation to God's throne and upon which His kingdom stands. Moses had nothing to do with it but merely the bloke who carried it down the mountain.
Do you understand how and why the law of Moses came about? Let's put this whole law issue in context.Well back to you. Sorry not sure how that happened. So if you are not talking about Old Testament Laws...you are saying????
Exactly. But we have an *expert* on the Old Covenant here who does not even understand this simple truth.The new covenant did not remove the laws of God... It set aside the laws of Moses which were temporary.
Do you understand how and why the law of Moses came about? Let's put this whole law issue in context.
KJV Galatians 3
17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Now, the law (of Moses) was added because of transgressions (against the law of God). The law was added, till the seed should come ... So indeed the law of Moses, which was added because of sin against the laws of God, was only a temporary measure until such time as Messiah could implement the new cinematic by which the laws of God could be kept and honoured without recourse to sacrifice and oblation, feasts, and laws given as a means of disciplining the nation into a mindset of obedience...a temporary fix. The new covenant did not remove the laws of God... It set aside the laws of Moses which were temporary.
Judaisers as you describe them, were not attempting to coerce the church into not stealing or committing adultery, refraining from idol worship or blasphemy... There is not even any incident where the apostles or the early church were told to observe the Sabbath... They were already doing all those things. What they weren't doing, and what upset the Jews, was they weren't circumcising their children. Circumcision was the issue. And that was the problem the Galatians had, that by circumcising the newly converted gentiles they were assisting in some way their membership into God's kingdom. Salvation by works... Circumcision. Nothing to do with any of the ten commandments. They stand.
Exactly. But we have an *expert* on the Old Covenant here who does not even understand this simple truth.
Do you observe the Sabbath?Exactly. But we have an *expert* on the Old Covenant here who does not even understand this simple truth.
Do you believe the 10 commandments were given to Abraham?18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
Yes. The Lord's Day (the first day of the week) is the Christian sabbath. John said "I was in the Spirit on the Lord's Day" (Rev 1:10).Do you observe the Sabbath?
You are showing your non-expertise with these remarks.Thank you for the expert! But the Laws are not temporary. And they were not set aside. The Laws are alive and well for anyone that is of the Old Covenant with God. The Laws will not change, not even a letter. The Laws cannot be sub-divided to follow a few. If you do anything with these Laws to change the body of Laws you are in violation of them all. And if you want to be a Jew that will be the first thing they will tell you. But none of that should be a concern for a Christian because Christians are not under any part of the Law.
We are not told. But a body of laws was indeed given to Abraham.So what law was given to Abraham?????
That is what is called "the day of the LORD" in the Old Testament. Christians need not have any day, or they can observe one if they want.Yes. The Lord's Day (the first day of the week) is the Christian sabbath. John said "I was in the Spirit on the Lord's Day" (Rev 1:10).
'The position now dominant in Western Christianity is that observance of the Lord's Day (Sunday) honours, supplanted or superseded the Sabbath commandment in that the former "celebrated the Christian community's deliverance from captivity to sin, Satan, and worldly passions, made possible by the resurrection on the first day of the week."...'
I would say the Eternal Unchanging Law of Love. Abraham kept the Law -- in Spirit, of course, not by the letter as given by the written laws of Moses. He could hear the Voice of God and he could understand, so he did not need the written laws.So what law was given to Abraham?????
It’s the very law we establish, The law of faith in Jesus Christ.I would say the Eternal Unchanging Law of Love. Abraham kept the Law -- in Spirit, of course, not by the letter as given by the written laws of Moses. He could hear the Voice of God and he could understand, so he did not need the written laws.
First off, I do not know about you, but Christ's teachings are written on my heart. No Laws.
You can say the Law was Holy. You can say it is what brought us to this point. You can say that Christ was the fulfillment of the Law. But if you say the word obedience, I have to assume obedience to Christ. If in anyway, shape, form or fashion you mean the Law, then you should start numbering the Laws you obey. I get this so many times, "I love the Law! I don't obey any of them, still.... You have to be careful, following Christ with only your lips will get you in trouble.
Judaisers as you describe them, were not attempting to coerce the church into not stealing or committing adultery, refraining from idol worship or blasphemy... There is not even any incident where the apostles or the early church were told to observe the Sabbath... They were already doing all those things. What they weren't doing, and what upset the Jews, was they weren't circumcising their children. Circumcision was the issue.
No Laws in the New Covenant.
FALLACY #1. The Laws are alive and well for anyone that is of the Old Covenant with God -- since the Old Covenant is now null and void it does not apply to anyone.
FALLACY #2. But the Laws are not temporary -- the epistle to the Hebrews will inform you that a whole host of Mosaic laws were temporary until "the time of Reformation".
FALLACY #3. The Laws cannot be sub-divided to follow a few -- The Bible clearly shows us that the laws can and were subdivided and all the laws pertaining to the tabernacle and temple were set aside on the day Christ died. That is why the veil in the temple was supernaturally torn in two from top to bottom.
FALLACY #4. If you do anything with these Laws to change the body of Laws you are in violation of them all -- in Acts 15 the Holy Spirit guided the apostles and elders gathered in Jerusalem to select and apply just four of the Mosaic laws to Gentiles. That was under the authority of God Himself.
Why should God repeat Himself. Isn't His authority sufficient that if He says... this the way things should be... Once is enough?Any Law that is worth repeating
Yes.Do you observe the Sabbath?