Hi Nancy,
1st: Three verses earlier in verse 24 it says, Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father. If we are to only follow the testimony of the Holy Spirit then John would be contradicting himself in verse 24. The instruction to let what they’ve heard abide in them implies they received instruction from men. Two chapters later John instructs his readers that listening to the apostles is the criterion for discerning the spirit of truth from the spirit of error: “We are of God. Whoever knows God listens to us, and he who is not of God does not listen to us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error” (1 John 4:6).
According to Matthew 18:15-17 one is not a part of the Christian community unless he adheres to the official teaching of the Church.
“They went out from us, but they were not of us” (1 John 2:19). That passage implies there are true teachers that Christians ought to listen to. And you already know the passages about sound doctrine, teachingings passed down to other good men and false doctrine taught by wolves sooooooo I won't bore you by repeating them. I don't see where your theory holds up to the teachings of scripture. The Council of Jerusalem is also an example of the elders (men) of The Church being our teacher for what is True. Not you deciding. Not me deciding. The Church decides!
2nd: If the Holy Spirit is your teacher and my teacher and Joe's teacher and your neighbors teacher and the Popes teacher and Luther's teacher etc. etc. BUT certainly not the CC teacher; WHY is the Holy Spirit/God telling all of us something different?
3rd: John 20:23 destroys your confession to man theory.
4th: How is it the men who lived closest to the time of Christ are wrong about this and the men who lived 1,500 years later right?
Curious Mary
Well, what I heard/read from the beginning was my little Psalms and Proverbs booklet I received when making my First Holy Communion. Of course, I couldn't wait to read it, not understanding it of course, I was like...6 years old I think?...I thought it was the whole bible in miniature, ha! Didn't get that till the Confirmation. But, as far as "teaching the Word", I recall not one thing that WAS taught. Never understood anything because nobody taught there.
So, "in the beginning" who BUT the Holy Spirit could bring things to light for me? My poor mom had to take care of 7 close in age and hyper kids so, she herself was not much into studies. BTW- 18:15-17 most certainly is used in Protestant Church's. Binding and loosing seems to be something that is closely related to weather or not the Church itself (Pastors, elders, deacons, Christians in general) decides to put someone outside the Church, and treat them as pagans and tax collectors...so, it seems to me that every part of the Church takes part in the removing and the binding and loosing. If someone in the congregation has or is doing something contrary to Gods word...they do not listen to one, two or three...then if they do not listen to the leaders of the Church...pastor, elders...then when the Church puts the out. Does this possibly have anything to do with "binding and loosing"? I do not claim to be a scholar of scripture and the Church. I'm just a run of the mill human, seeking God with openness and honesty. I do not claim to know all things, actually I do NOT know or even fully understand much when it comes to the very deep things of Him...I have so much to learn and not a whole lot of time so, should we go against our own consciences and veer away from what we "first heard"?
Sorry I am not much of a debater here so...go for it. :)