aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Hey look! It’s another thread discussing race with the usual suspects promoting racism.....how unique
The Race Question is a Godly Question
- Thread starter Stranger
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Oh look. It's aspen, projecting his racism. How predictable.
By the way, aspen, what happened to your thread about your particiaption in the antifa....I mean Trump ralley? It is no where to be found that I can see. Maybe it's just me.
Stranger
By the way, aspen, what happened to your thread about your particiaption in the antifa....I mean Trump ralley? It is no where to be found that I can see. Maybe it's just me.
Stranger
Last edited:
JohnPaul
Soldier of Jehovah and Christ
Maybe it's that old mate does not truly understand what prejudice truly is I believe, or is it just a new age blinkers thing like one many have to put on a horse so it does not get spooked so easy, because such can not deal with reality that well.
All the morons nowadays that are so wound up about things that no one really gave a hoot about looking back 20 or 30 years ago, one could of had D Trump in office back then and no one would of bothered with what he says at all in fact.
There is a dark cloud over this generation, that have been wound up like a toy and made to dance to the tune of all the Satanist, even Pope Paul said about it had entered into the RCC back then and now we have Pope Frances kissing the hand of Lord Rothschild in the same way that all who are under the Pope do to him when sitting in the Chair, not to mention this was done on TV and one can look it up on youtube. but them their blinkers sure do work a treat, as they are oblivious to what the Pope was truly doing in fact, The Pope was giving his obedience to Lord Rothschild, the family that owns half of the world's wealth.
Or like when a Premier of my State sprouts Satanic dribble about a so called 2ed Testament on stage in front of all of the Catholic Schools Parents
: and all of the fools swallowed the Premiers dribble !!! who is a left wing retard that did not even know what the GST rate was and was sprouting with arms up high, than now it was in charge of the States finances .Prejudice is a Sin under Communism and so is Racism, one can not pre judge anyone because you are all regarded as the lowest denominator by such a degenerate dictator Government and the same with Race it just does not exist at all as far as they are concerned, because they do not respect anyone that is under their Satanic power. they do not respect anyone's race because they are the destroyer's of all culture and Soul, because such people do not have a Soul.
I point out evil and corruption regardless and call it out regardless of who or what it is and if that offends some so called race or bunch of slobs, that's their problem as I have every right to call out filth for what it truly is. just as Jesus did, not to mention that he was killed because people don't like the truth or can't handle the truth.
Maybe it's that old mate does not truly understand what prejudice truly is I believe, or is it just a new age blinkers thing like one many have to put on a horse so it does not get spooked so easy, because such can not deal with reality that well.
All the morons nowadays that are so wound up about things that no one really gave a hoot about looking back 20 or 30 years ago, one could of had D Trump in office back then and no one would of bothered with what he says at all in fact.
There is a dark cloud over this generation, that have been wound up like a toy and made to dance to the tune of all the Satanist, even Pope Paul said about it had entered into the RCC back then and now we have Pope Frances kissing the hand of Lord Rothschild in the same way that all who are under the Pope do to him when sitting in the Chair, not to mention this was done on TV and one can look it up on youtube. but them their blinkers sure do work a treat, as they are oblivious to what the Pope was truly doing in fact, The Pope was giving his obedience to Lord Rothschild, the family that owns half of the world's wealth.
Or like when a Premier of my State sprouts Satanic dribble about a so called 2ed Testament on stage in front of all of the Catholic Schools Parents
Prejudice is a Sin under Communism and so is Racism, one can not pre judge anyone because you are all regarded as the lowest denominator by such a degenerate dictator Government and the same with Race it just does not exist at all as far as they are concerned, because they do not respect anyone that is under their Satanic power. they do not respect anyone's race because they are the destroyer's of all culture and Soul, because such people do not have a Soul.
I point out evil and corruption regardless and call it out regardless of who or what it is and if that offends some so called race or bunch of slobs, that's their problem as I have every right to call out filth for what it truly is. just as Jesus did, not to mention that he was killed because people don't like the truth or can't handle the truth.
Good points. Keep moving forward. I ceased letting being called a racist bother me a long time ago.
Stranger
What has to happen is to define what it truly is that the new age is peddling nowadays and call them out on such, because people are putting labels on a subject that is pure fantasy.
The bastardisation of words nowadays can be just so loose, take a case where Australia's PM claimed that the opposition Leader was a misogynist by the PM, now that dude had 3 daughters that loved him and I am sure he loved them all, but this stupid ignorant lefty retard PM had to peddle such rot to the public at the time and then i seen that she the former PM was interviewed about this point that she had raised. the question was asked was that did she truly believe that the word in how it was traditionally used was fitting and she smiled and all coy said no no no ! but as to the socialist new age point of view was what she was peddling it's point of view, the view that we all nowadays must submit to, as Socialist ?
So one must be mindful of that such is a socialist perception of where they are coming from not to mention that all people are just a number in reality to such a Government and that they are in fact at war with what the free world was all about, Socialist are Slaves to the flesh !
When one understand that Holy Moses came to free Gods people, it was because such a people do not need to be enslaved, because they are of God and not just a number too their captives. a people who will not be ruled by God are destined to be ruled by Tyrants !
People nowadays look to human rights to save them all as if such was a god to them (idol) but is it that People nowadays are just to timid to endure responsibilities and that's the real key to such problems.
Albert Einstein quote. I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction, the world will have a generation of idiots.
The act of Marriage equality is about silencing everyone who doesn't endorse homosexuality.
Calling a child, 'Little man', is not only totally incorrect but is in fact a insult, but such has crept in due to ignorance.
Perverse is now called progressive.
No,that's not correct,scripture gives us the meaning without a doubt,why are you'll trying to change it?
Leviticus 20:11 "And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them."
What part of this verse is not understandable ????
No that wasn't a slight (misspelling)heck I didn't even notice that ,and I do it all the time as well .
Leviticus 18:7 "The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness."
When you lie with either father or mother, you uncover the nakedness of the other. When man and wife become married, they become one flesh. So what you are doing to one, you also do to the other.
Leviticus 18:8 "The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness."
In the Hebrew text, when it is stated "thy father's wife, it is referring to the step mother. In verse seven it is talking about the blood mother and father, and in this verse the step parent of the individual talked about. This is also extended to concubines at this time of the writing.
Leviticus 18:9 "The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover."
This verse is talking about sexual activity with the half sister of the man, born to either the father or the mother, born in the family unit or outside the family unit; dealing with first and second marriages. When the father has had a first marriage, and this relationship then is with a son or daughter of the first marriage, marrying the daughter of the second marriage.
Leviticus 18:10 "The nakedness of thy son's daughter, or of thy daughter's daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thine own nakedness."
This then is looking at a sexual relations between a grandparent and the grand-daughter or grandson. The act is forbidden by God and is punishable by death to those that do it. This is kin flesh to each other.
Leviticus 18:11 "The nakedness of thy father's wife's daughter, begotten of the father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness."
This again is talking about a half-sister and half brother sexual relationship. Again this comes about when there is a second marriage.
Leviticus 18:12 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father's sister: she is thy father's near kinswoman."
This is talking about the sexual relationship between a paternal aunt with her nephew; both coming from the lineage of the same blood line.
Leviticus 18:13 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother's sister: for she is thy mother's near kinsman."
This is the relationship between a nephew and his mother's sister, also of the same blood line.
Leviticus 18:14 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father's brother, thou shalt not approach to his wife: she is thine aunt."
This then is talking about the sexual relations between the wife of an uncle on your father's side of the family.
Leviticus 18:15 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter in law: she is thy son's wife; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness."
This instruction is between the father and daughter in law, which is also forbidden. We see all the various combinations of relatives and that all sexual relation between them is strictly forbidden by God. The punishment to these relationship will be covered later on; for it is death to both parties by stoning. These set of instructions are dealing with the lineage that our Lord and Savior would be born through, as we read in Luke 3:23-38; and Matthew 1:1-17.
Leviticus 18:16 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife: it is thy brother's nakedness."
Though this is given in the negative, there is also an exception to this verse. For if the brother dies, then the brother of the diseased man is required to marry her if there were no children born to his brother.
Deuteronomy 25:5 "If thy brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto her."
Deuteronomy 25:6 "And it shall be, that the firstborn which she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother which is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel."
Leviticus 18:17 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son's daughter, or her daughter's daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness."
This is covered in more detail in Deuteronomy 27:20, for it becomes a cursed thine to have sexual relations with ones mother in law. This forbids one to take a woman and her daughter to wife at the same time, for they are near kinswomen themselves. Having a common husband becomes wickedness.
Leviticus 18:18 "Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her life time."
This is talking about marrying two sisters at the same time, or marrying the second sister, while the first sister is still alive. To vex her, is to bind her up in a relationship of commitment while the other sister is still living. With the two sisters having a common husband would be the same as the two sisters sharing the same bed [the act of homosexuality].
Leviticus 18:19 "Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness."
This verse gets back to Leviticus 12, and 15:19 whereby after childbirth there is a time of separation between husband and wife while she is in her state of uncleanness.
Where is this stated in Genesis 9????
We cannot simply project something heinous when there is absolutely no indication in the passage itself. And quoting a whole bunch of passages to prove your point does not strengthen it in the least, since they all have been taken out of context.
So what part of Genesis 9:22-24 (which is in plain English) do YOU not understand? This passage is very clear that because a garment was required to cover Noah's nakedness, a garment was placed over him. No indication of anything else whatsoever, and no sexual act.
Strong's Concordance (6172)
ervah: nakedness
Original Word: עֶרְוָה
Part of Speech: Noun Feminine
Transliteration: ervah
Phonetic Spelling: (er-vaw')
Definition: nakedness
Brown-Driver-Briggs
1 pudenda, of man ׳רָאָה ע implying shameful exposure Genesis 9:22,23
Why are people trying to read into this passage what is not there?
We all seem to as always have different takes on scripture,as for the race problem that we have ,hope this verse resonates within you all
Genesis 1:31 "And God saw every thing that He had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
At the close of the sixth day the earth and all life form's, plant and animal alike, were in existence. The condition of the earth was inhabitable, and all the stars and planets were set in their places in the heavens. We know that the condition of the earth was such that God intended for mankind to have a very lengthy life span. The age of mankind that is recorded in the Bible prior to the flood of Noah's time, was upwards of eight to nine hundred years, and greater. We also must agree that it was good, for God repeated; "and it was very good" after days creation.
Going back in time, through the recorded generations, there are not that many, in comparison to the the time evolutionist would have us believe. When we compare Joseph's father in law [Jesus father's] lineage in Luke 3:23-38; we notice a continuous line from the creation of Adam to Jesus. It is interesting that there are seventy seven [77] generations from Adam to Jesus Christ. Seven in biblical numerics represents "spiritual completeness". You might say the double sevens [77] would be a double witness to "spiritual completeness"; the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The word "Adam" in the Strong's Hebrew dictionary is given under # 120; "Adam, aw-dawm'; from 119, ruddy, a human being, person." So the prime root in the Hebrew dictionary, # 119; "Adam, aw-dam' to show blood in the face, flesh, turn rosy, be made ruddy [red]." This race of Adam then is a white race which will show ruddy [red], and turn red to show the blood.
On the sixth day, "male and female created He them". God created all the races, however, in the creation of "Adam" we will see in the next chapter that God stated purpose for Adam, and His intent for the Adamic race are that they are "to till the ground." That means that they are to be farmers.
There has developed a foolish idea that the African American race came from a sin of Ham, "when he looked upon his fathers nakedness". The meaning of the verse in Genesis 9:22-23 is explained in Leviticus 18:8. "The nakedness of thy father is to lay with thy father's wife [your mother". In Ham's case, we saw that the product of that sin relationship between Ham, and his mother, was the birth of "Canaan", Ham's son. That is why Noah cursed Canaan, and set a curse upon Canaan's children.
Both Noah's wife and Ham [Noah's son] were white, and of the Adamic race, for we are told such in Genesis 6:9. The child Canaan was also of the same race, and simple common sense will tell you so. This curse on Canaan was not placed by God, but by Noah. He was angry with his son, but this curse certainly would not be the creation of a black race, or any race. All children of incest are still of the same kind as it's parents.
I feel personally that all races go back much farther then the Adamic race, maybe even a thousand years or greater, however it is speculation, for there is no written documentation, except those buried in the stones and bones of prior generations. The Adamic race record is important though, for through it came the Savior of all mankind and all races, our Lord Jesus Christ.
genesis1
You won't get it unless you understand that all races were created at the same time.
Genesis 1:31 "And God saw every thing that He had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
At the close of the sixth day the earth and all life form's, plant and animal alike, were in existence. The condition of the earth was inhabitable, and all the stars and planets were set in their places in the heavens. We know that the condition of the earth was such that God intended for mankind to have a very lengthy life span. The age of mankind that is recorded in the Bible prior to the flood of Noah's time, was upwards of eight to nine hundred years, and greater. We also must agree that it was good, for God repeated; "and it was very good" after days creation.
Going back in time, through the recorded generations, there are not that many, in comparison to the the time evolutionist would have us believe. When we compare Joseph's father in law [Jesus father's] lineage in Luke 3:23-38; we notice a continuous line from the creation of Adam to Jesus. It is interesting that there are seventy seven [77] generations from Adam to Jesus Christ. Seven in biblical numerics represents "spiritual completeness". You might say the double sevens [77] would be a double witness to "spiritual completeness"; the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The word "Adam" in the Strong's Hebrew dictionary is given under # 120; "Adam, aw-dawm'; from 119, ruddy, a human being, person." So the prime root in the Hebrew dictionary, # 119; "Adam, aw-dam' to show blood in the face, flesh, turn rosy, be made ruddy [red]." This race of Adam then is a white race which will show ruddy [red], and turn red to show the blood.
On the sixth day, "male and female created He them". God created all the races, however, in the creation of "Adam" we will see in the next chapter that God stated purpose for Adam, and His intent for the Adamic race are that they are "to till the ground." That means that they are to be farmers.
There has developed a foolish idea that the African American race came from a sin of Ham, "when he looked upon his fathers nakedness". The meaning of the verse in Genesis 9:22-23 is explained in Leviticus 18:8. "The nakedness of thy father is to lay with thy father's wife [your mother". In Ham's case, we saw that the product of that sin relationship between Ham, and his mother, was the birth of "Canaan", Ham's son. That is why Noah cursed Canaan, and set a curse upon Canaan's children.
Both Noah's wife and Ham [Noah's son] were white, and of the Adamic race, for we are told such in Genesis 6:9. The child Canaan was also of the same race, and simple common sense will tell you so. This curse on Canaan was not placed by God, but by Noah. He was angry with his son, but this curse certainly would not be the creation of a black race, or any race. All children of incest are still of the same kind as it's parents.
I feel personally that all races go back much farther then the Adamic race, maybe even a thousand years or greater, however it is speculation, for there is no written documentation, except those buried in the stones and bones of prior generations. The Adamic race record is important though, for through it came the Savior of all mankind and all races, our Lord Jesus Christ.
genesis1
You won't get it unless you understand that all races were created at the same time.
So we just gonna ignore Leviticus?Have you ever seen your Mother or Father naked?What sin was that?
Also what reason did he have to go in the tent,quite sure it was private?
Anyway stay were you are,but I would love an answer to Leviticus
Last edited:
Before the fall of mankind in the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve lived without clothing in a perfectly natural state (Genesis 2:25). But after the fall, nakedness became a source of shame (Genesis 3:6–7). In fact, shame at their own nakedness was the first felt consequence of Adam and Eve’s sin. Since then, nakedness has been linked with sexuality, privacy, and vulnerability. When the Bible speaks of “uncovering nakedness,” it is usually referring to some type of sexual sin, perversion, or dishonor.
The first reference to uncovering someone’s nakedness is in Genesis 9, which continues the story of Noah after the floodwaters receded. Noah and his sons and their spouses had established a new life as the only human beings left to repopulate the earth. As time went by, Noah planted a vineyard and made wine from the grapes. He then drank the wine, became drunk, and passed out naked in his tent (Genesis 9:20–21). His son Ham entered the tent, saw his father’s nakedness, and went to tell his brothers (Genesis 9:22). Scholars debate what may have transpired in this scene. The sin may have been more than merely mocking his father’s naked body. Ham (or his son Canaan) may have engaged in some kind of sexual activity or dishonor of Noah’s private parts. Whatever he did by uncovering his father’s nakedness was wicked enough to invite Noah’s wrath when he sobered up. Noah then pronounced a strong curse on Canaan (Genesis 9:24).
The phrase uncover nakedness almost always refers to sexual sin. In most newer versions of the Bible, the phrase uncover nakedness is usually reworded as “have sexual relations with” (e.g., Leviticus 18:6, 17, 19). Other passages, such as Deuteronomy 22:30, forbade a man to sleep with his stepmother because doing so would “uncover his father’s nakedness” (ESV). By entering into intimacy with the same woman who had slept with his father, a man disgraced his father (Deuteronomy 27:20; Leviticus 18:8; Ezekiel 22:10). This was one reason the sin of Absalom, David’s son, was so great (2 Samuel 16:22). As the ultimate act of disrespect, Absalom let it be known publicly that he was having sex with his father’s concubines. He not only violated his father’s bedroom, he violated God’s written law: “Cursed is anyone who sleeps with his father’s wife, for he dishonors his father’s bed” (Deuteronomy 27:20).
As our world’s morals continue to spiral downward, uncovering nakedness in one way or another has become a favorite pastime. Culture has glorified nakedness and worked to numb our natural modesty by parading nakedness before our eyes. Even children’s clothing is sexualized, and media outlets praise nakedness as “bold,” “brave,” and “liberating.” We watch actors uncovering each other’s nakedness publicly on the big screen. The pornography industry has made a fortune by uncovering nakedness in every possible way, mocking biblical moral standards as archaic and restrictive.
We’ve lost the concept of honor for one’s sexuality, treating the sex drive as just another need to be met the way we treat hunger and thirst. Uncovering nakedness is no longer a source of shame in a culture that has been trained to expect and applaud it. Ironically, in a world that celebrates the uncovering of nakedness, sexual dysfunctions, abuses, and even infertility are skyrocketing. God created the human body, and sexuality is His idea; He therefore knows best how we function. First Corinthians 6:13 says, “You say, ‘Food for the stomach and the stomach for food, and God will destroy them both.’ The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.”
God intended the uncovering of nakedness to be done only within His prescribed boundaries of marriage (1 Corinthians 7:2–5). Christians can help reclaim the sanctity of marital relations and modesty by refusing to deaden our consciences through sexually graphic TV programs, movies, and magazines. We can guard our eyes against pornographic images by installing filters on our internet devices. And we can honor our bodies by refusing to uncover our own nakedness in the way we dress, talk, or behave (1 Corinthians 6:18). Nakedness is no longer innocent as it was in the Garden of Eden, and wise people do not uncover it in dishonoring ways.
What does it mean to uncover nakedness in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
The first reference to uncovering someone’s nakedness is in Genesis 9, which continues the story of Noah after the floodwaters receded. Noah and his sons and their spouses had established a new life as the only human beings left to repopulate the earth. As time went by, Noah planted a vineyard and made wine from the grapes. He then drank the wine, became drunk, and passed out naked in his tent (Genesis 9:20–21). His son Ham entered the tent, saw his father’s nakedness, and went to tell his brothers (Genesis 9:22). Scholars debate what may have transpired in this scene. The sin may have been more than merely mocking his father’s naked body. Ham (or his son Canaan) may have engaged in some kind of sexual activity or dishonor of Noah’s private parts. Whatever he did by uncovering his father’s nakedness was wicked enough to invite Noah’s wrath when he sobered up. Noah then pronounced a strong curse on Canaan (Genesis 9:24).
The phrase uncover nakedness almost always refers to sexual sin. In most newer versions of the Bible, the phrase uncover nakedness is usually reworded as “have sexual relations with” (e.g., Leviticus 18:6, 17, 19). Other passages, such as Deuteronomy 22:30, forbade a man to sleep with his stepmother because doing so would “uncover his father’s nakedness” (ESV). By entering into intimacy with the same woman who had slept with his father, a man disgraced his father (Deuteronomy 27:20; Leviticus 18:8; Ezekiel 22:10). This was one reason the sin of Absalom, David’s son, was so great (2 Samuel 16:22). As the ultimate act of disrespect, Absalom let it be known publicly that he was having sex with his father’s concubines. He not only violated his father’s bedroom, he violated God’s written law: “Cursed is anyone who sleeps with his father’s wife, for he dishonors his father’s bed” (Deuteronomy 27:20).
As our world’s morals continue to spiral downward, uncovering nakedness in one way or another has become a favorite pastime. Culture has glorified nakedness and worked to numb our natural modesty by parading nakedness before our eyes. Even children’s clothing is sexualized, and media outlets praise nakedness as “bold,” “brave,” and “liberating.” We watch actors uncovering each other’s nakedness publicly on the big screen. The pornography industry has made a fortune by uncovering nakedness in every possible way, mocking biblical moral standards as archaic and restrictive.
We’ve lost the concept of honor for one’s sexuality, treating the sex drive as just another need to be met the way we treat hunger and thirst. Uncovering nakedness is no longer a source of shame in a culture that has been trained to expect and applaud it. Ironically, in a world that celebrates the uncovering of nakedness, sexual dysfunctions, abuses, and even infertility are skyrocketing. God created the human body, and sexuality is His idea; He therefore knows best how we function. First Corinthians 6:13 says, “You say, ‘Food for the stomach and the stomach for food, and God will destroy them both.’ The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.”
God intended the uncovering of nakedness to be done only within His prescribed boundaries of marriage (1 Corinthians 7:2–5). Christians can help reclaim the sanctity of marital relations and modesty by refusing to deaden our consciences through sexually graphic TV programs, movies, and magazines. We can guard our eyes against pornographic images by installing filters on our internet devices. And we can honor our bodies by refusing to uncover our own nakedness in the way we dress, talk, or behave (1 Corinthians 6:18). Nakedness is no longer innocent as it was in the Garden of Eden, and wise people do not uncover it in dishonoring ways.
What does it mean to uncover nakedness in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
JohnPaul
Soldier of Jehovah and Christ
JohnPaul
Soldier of Jehovah and Christ
There will be a day where the wicked will be slaughtered and the deviant smitten off the face of God's green Earth.
The World is being led astray by the workings of Satanist, the Anti-Christ.
Just look around nowadays and some creep will be peddling something that is directly Anti-Christ, not to mention who stands in their way ? and condemns such dribble nowadays, the Pope ? NO ! not at all ! he is in bed with the Anti-Christ mob claiming that the god that they believe in is the same god ? No it's not the same God as our Lord and Saviour is, because the god that Islam is peddling is in fact pointed out as not the God of Christianity, because the fact is that no one comes to the Father but through his only begotten Son ! so how can one who rejects Jesus Christ as such, be as one with the Father ? when they in fact do not know him at all, just as it is with the Jews in fact.
What is it that they do not get with the fact, that No one comes to the Father but through his only begotten Son, such are truly condemned and the stupid moron Pope Frances can not be born again Christian because he is in fact rejecting this fact that Jesus said, Pope Frances has another Jesus ? because he does not stand up for Jesus Christ and fact is the bastard never mentions the words Jesus Christ as he substitutes the word god where ever he possible can, now I ask why is that ? is it because of political correctness, so as not to offend the Jews and Islam or the poor demented Atheist bastards that are lost under the influence of Satan.
So that Christianity nowadays has become a wishy washy appeasing parasite that will truly not stand up for our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and so the fact is that the World will become enslaved under the powers of Satan and we can see this is on the cards now as it sticks out like gods balls.
It's the Blind leading the blind and this crap about the rapture and 2ed coming peddled nowadays is the work of Satan, because hey are looking for a Jesus ? fact is if they were found and truly born again they need not look any further, because such a one is in the Kingdom of God. that's the whole point one must be born again ! then you are in the Kingdom of God.
There are People that have been born again for 2000 years of history who are of the Kingdom of God and nowadays we have this evil that rejects this fact and is waiting with bated breath for the hell on Earth to come, I have talked to such people and they are shaking their fist at God, wanting no demanding him to come down here, but I say he will come in his own due time because it has nothing to do with your claims, you are here to serve in Christ Jesus only, that's your calling and creating havoc is not a Christians calling at all as such will only reap what they sowed.
Last edited:
JohnPaul
Soldier of Jehovah and Christ
Similar threads
