That shows your dishonesty right there and lack of integrity. Clean soul huh?Both Scripture and I agree with you....She didn't have other children by waving a wand. ;)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That shows your dishonesty right there and lack of integrity. Clean soul huh?Both Scripture and I agree with you....She didn't have other children by waving a wand. ;)
And you don't know how to write in Spanish. It's ingles not inglais....;)Really? ....suddenly U --no habla inglais??
And you don't know how to write in Spanish. It's ingles not inglais....;)Really? ....suddenly U --no habla inglais??
It would be pointless to quote any Scriptures in this connection to a Roman Catholic. One of your fundamental dogmas is the perpetual virginity of Mary.What Scripture verse says that the "brothers and sisters" of Jesus were children of Mary?
You stated she didn't have other children by waving a wand.That shows your dishonesty right there and lack of integrity. Clean soul huh?
Sooooo no Scripture to back up what you believe...Thank you.It would be pointless to quote any Scriptures in this connection to a Roman Catholic. One of your fundamental dogmas is the perpetual virginity of Mary.
Your fundamental dogma is that she wasn't a virgin. Scripture says she was. At least one of us is holding to what Scripture says...It would be pointless to quote any Scriptures in this connection to a Roman Catholic. One of your fundamental dogmas is the perpetual virginity of Mary.
Not fooling anyone btw with that dishonesty.You stated she didn't have other children by waving a wand.
I agree with you. She didn't have other children by waving a wand.....or having sex...or drinking a magic potion or by any other means.
Sooooooo how am I being dishonest by agreeing with you.....hmmmm.....
The arrogance of the romanists.And you don't know how to write in Spanish. It's ingles not inglais....;)
You should stop before you embarrass yourself more...![]()
I spelled it phonetically on purpose so you could read it.And you don't know how to write in Spanish. It's ingles not inglais....;)
You should stop before you embarrass yourself more...![]()
and you could learn manners, just sayin' and btw, this is not a game.You need to learn Greek....;)
You are confusing arrogance with confidence.The arrogance of the romanists.
I apologize.....I didn't notice you were trolling our conversation.Not fooling anyone btw with that dishonesty.
.... and that was Core Issue who you Know was stating Mary had her other children the usual way, not by waving a wand.
sure you did.....;)I spelled it phonetically on purpose so you could read it.
What manner would that be? A woman shouldn't tell a man what she thinks?and you could learn manners, just sayin' and btw, this is not a game.
You're the one that referred to it as a game saying "game set match"What manner would that be? A woman shouldn't tell a man what she thinks?
I agree.....this is not a game. When one denies the Truth they will be playing their game in fire.
Nope, not confusing it, ....there is conceit there too. It's the spirit that is behind the rcc, it always thinks it can outsmart the Holy Spirit.You are confusing arrogance with confidence.
But she most assuredly have children the natural way.Both Scripture and I agree with you....She didn't have other children by waving a wand. ;)