D
Dave L
Guest
It was a choice about national preservation, not salvation.So, when Joshua gave them the choice to serve the Lord or serve other gods, somehow that wasn't a choice for them?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It was a choice about national preservation, not salvation.So, when Joshua gave them the choice to serve the Lord or serve other gods, somehow that wasn't a choice for them?
Joshua 24:15 Calvinists are impossible.
Yes...go to your interlinear....it says everyone believing,the idea is everyone believing and continuing to believe...NO KIDDING
Funny, in all of this not one scripture reference posited, just philosophy. I gave you NUMEROUS vss showing the lost are slaves to sin and you didn’t address even one of them, just gave me a philosophy lesson.Freewill is perquisite for responsibility. A person who lack s freewill cannot be held culpable for any actions. Therefore, under Calvinism, Bob (who lacks freewill) cannot be held responsible for being an atheist or sinning -- he has no choice otherwise!
Funny, in all of this not one scripture reference posited, just philosophy. I gave you NUMEROUS vss showing the lost are slaves to sin and you didn’t address even one of them, just gave me a philosophy lesson.
Yep. That's because their gospel doesn't exist in Scripture, and they're not interested in the least to look at what is offered them from within Scripture.Funny, in all of this not one scripture reference posited, just philosophy. I gave you NUMEROUS vss showing the lost are slaves to sin and you didn’t address even one of them, just gave me a philosophy lesson.
Guess we'll have to pick up copies of Calvinism's Collegiate Dictionary of Changed Word Defintions LOLSupposedly it wasn't "choice", just like "all" and "the world" are not really ALL and THE WORLD. The simplicity stumps them Phone.
Guess we'll have to pick up copies of Calvinism's Collegiate Dictionary of Changed Word Defintions LOL
Pretty sure Revelation 22:14 makes it clear about the eternal consequences for obedience to either the one Master or the other.It was a choice about national preservation, not salvation.
Ya might need to hire a lawyer, or a Sadducee to interpret...![]()
You said that Calvinist beliefs were completely logical. Therefore, answering a logical question should be easy.Funny, in all of this not one scripture reference posited, just philosophy. I gave you NUMEROUS vss showing the lost are slaves to sin and you didn’t address even one of them, just gave me a philosophy lesson.
What does that have to do with the indisputable fact that Joshua laid before the entire multitude the choice to either serve the Lord or other gods?
Rather than stooping to personal insults, would you care to answer the logical question about your beliefs I posted in #711?Yep. That's because their gospel doesn't exist in Scripture, and they're not interested in the least to look at what is offered them from within Scripture.
Exactly, but "They have never heard it that way afore!" so it can not be true!It was a choice about national preservation, not salvation.
Instead of rolling your eyes and making assumptions on the text, you probably would do well to go read the text, real slow, without reading free will choosing one's self into heaven into its context. Right?I guess even in Joshua 24:15 - "choose" does not really "mean" choose...![]()
Bound up in our choice to serve either the one God or the other god is the eternal consequence for our choice. Even Lucifer's servants understand this concept. Bob Dylan, who admits he sold his soul to Satan for fame, wrote a song called "Gotta Serve Somebody". That's Joshua's point to the people:That passage has nothing to do with eternal salvation. It's not "decide yourselves into heaven" because "look at my family, we decided ourselves into heaven."
Furthermore Joshua never once told them in that passage to choose God.
Which gods did he tell them to choose from? Show me where one he offered for them to choose from was YHWH.
The fact he was a servant of the LORD showed he was regenerate, it wasn't the cause. No one serves God without first being converted, and, choosing doesn't save, Jesus does.
Personal insults? Accurate observations are not an insult. Your accusing me of lying about what others plainly teach on here would be considered an insult, but I'm not taking it personally, it's just another observation of behavior.Rather than stooping to personal insults, would you care to answer the logical question about your beliefs I posted in #711?
And the only thing Calvinists got in response is "How DARE YOU, the clay, question the Potter???!!!"Freewill is perquisite for responsibility. A person who lack s freewill cannot be held culpable for any actions. Therefore, under Calvinism, Bob (who lacks freewill) cannot be held responsible for being an atheist or sinning -- he has no choice otherwise!
And the only thing Calvinists got in response is "How DARE YOU, the clay, question the Potter???!!!"
You are Romans 9:20 personified, that's sadly a fact.And the only thing Calvinists got in response is "How DARE YOU, the clay, question the Potter???!!!"