CCP Proves ‘Climate’ Fight Not Really About Climate (Part 1)

[talons]

But also scientists are taking about a four foot rise on average over the next century. So his house will probably rot away before it hits that.

Scientists do talk a lot .

 

[Skovand]

Scientists do talk a lot .

Part of it is that science develops with the data. As more data comes in, more detailed analysis can be presented. Also, what many often misunderstand is that scientists are often focused on different areas. So one may be referring to cooler temps in america within 150-200 years and another is referring to warmer temps between 15/-years or that Texas may receive more hurricanes while the Philippines receive less.

It’s like when someone says “science said coffee is good and then another said it’s bad” but the good one was referring to 6 ounces of black coffee while the other is referring to a 20 ounce Starbucks dessert coffee.

What’s important is to realize that out of 8,000,000 scientists almost all but a few thousand has data that supports global climate change.

 

[Wrangler]

scientists are taking about a four foot rise on average over the next century.

The hallmark of science is predictive ability. Regarding the hoax of manmade global warming, scientists predictions have been all proven wrong. Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions - Competitive Enterprise Institute

 

[Wrangler]

What’s important is to realize that out of 8,000,000 scientists almost all but a few thousand has data that supports global climate change.

A true believer. Climate always changes. I see now, you are not even making a pretense of blaming man or the internal combustion engine.

 

[talons]

What’s important is to realize that out of 8,000,000 scientists almost all but a few thousand has data that supports global climate change.

I am not a scientist but I believe in global climate change . Just not man made . Follow the money .

 

[Skovand]

I am not a scientist but I believe in global climate change . Just not man made . Follow the money .

The bulk of the money seems to come from industries that deny it the most or try to underplay it. What I follow is scientific consensus. Almost all of the eight million scientists accept it and most of them are poor. Most are not rich. Like the 22 year old filipina scientist in the Philippines collecting data showing caterpillars coming out 3-4 weeks earlier, throwing off the hatching of birds with a fraction of the food to eat because temps are hitting warmer days few weeks earlier.

 

[talons]

The bulk of the money seems to come from industries that deny it the most or try to underplay it. What I follow is scientific consensus. Almost all of the eight million scientists accept it and most of them are poor. Most are not rich. Like the 22 year old filipina scientist in the Philippines collecting data showing caterpillars coming out 3-4 weeks earlier, throwing off the hatching of birds with a fraction of the food to eat because temps are hitting warmer days few weeks earlier.

Accept it you say , is it being forced on them ! ? ! I have nothing against honest scientists , great people and we need more of them .
The money I am talking about is Carbon Capture and Carbon credits .

 

[Wrangler]

The hallmark of science is predictive ability. Regarding the hoax of manmade global warming, scientists predictions have been all proven wrong. Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions - Competitive Enterprise Institute

In light of how the vast majority of scare mongering predictions are wrong, it is amazing how many zealots still believe the science is on their side.