Wrangler
Well-Known Member
While I appreciate you proving TDS is real, you speak in negation. What political party are you loyal to? 100% down the line Independent?
Trump Derangement Syndrome is very real!!!
- Thread starter Debp
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I generally vote Republican. But I make an exception in Trump's case. This explains why: Frank P. Spinella Jr.: I don't see the GOP I was once proud to vote for
Not for Trump. Not for Harris. Down ticket I'll probably be voting Republican all the way.
Wrangler
Well-Known Member
We are polar opposites. I don't vote either major party but make an exception in Trump's case.
I've had it with the RINO's! What's worse than an enemy? A traitor.
Just out of curiosity, what Trump's policies that you find objectionable that you'd rather not see be a reality?
- Pro America: Peace & Prosperity. Greatest 401K increase in any 4 year span and lowest unemployement since statistics were kept.
- Close borders
- Destroyed ISIS.
- Pro-Israel. Recognizing Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.
- Lowest unemployment for women in history.
- Lowest unemployment for Blacks since records were kept.
- Lowest unemployment among Hispanics.
- Highest 1st time Black home ownership.
- Energy independence
- Biggest tax cuts in human history.
- Cut more regulations than any POTUS.
- More laws passed in first year than any POTUS besides Truman.
- Appointed more judges than any POTUS since Washington.
- Abraham accords, deserving another Noble Prize.
- Stopped Iranian aggression.
- Stopped N Korea from launching missile tests, threatening neighbors.
- Walked across the 38th parallel needing a wheelbarrow to carry his balls as he walked across by himself.
- Dramatic improvement to care for Vets.
- Reject Paris accords, which would have hurt American jobs.
- Replaced horrible NAFTA with USMCA.
- Daily tweets causing Leftists heads to explode daily.
- Created Space Force.
- Got 3 USSC Justices appointed.
- Which got R-W overturned, slowing our society's devotion to baby killing.
- Brought American manufacturing jobs back to America.
- Got more votes than any POTUS running for re-election in American history.
What is your expectation for this country between the two of them? You realize one or the other will be our next president, barring sudden death or something like that, right?
Do you think one or the other will be better or worse for our country? And, how much worse do you expect we can afford and keep whatever is left of our republic? Should we actually just give it away?
Much love!
All I can say is to me the choice is obvious, either for someone who is already proven to lead us into a place of greater prosperity, personal safety, and personal liberty, or someone who is proven to lead us into a place of poverty and crime and the abrogation of our civil rights.
Do you know which I'm speaking of in each case?
Much love!
Something I just don't understand is how any American citizen would not share my preference. Just sayin'.
Michiah-Imla
Well-Known Member
His personal feelings trump common sense.
Hatred is a powerful emotion which often makes one unreasonable.
Platform | Donald J. Trump For President 2024
Certified Website of Donald J. Trump For President 2024. Together, we will save our country!
Wrangler
Well-Known Member
It's a thing of beauty to see how effective indoctrination is. The Kamala voter has an opinion but does not know why she has the opinion she does!
The unexamined life is not worth living. Socrates
What's sad is her vote counts as much as the vote of someone who has done due diligence. For decades, I realized it'd be best to substantially reduce who is allowed to vote. "I don't watch things - politically" ought to be reason to disqualify the mouth breather.
The term Deep State ... has some truth to it, but it is about law dictating what is acceptable behaviour and what is not.
The difficulty is every system can be corrupted by lobbyst and billions of dollars to justify their business positions.
Is there an actual choice here or just deep danger? The proposition is dictatorship to change the country or to stay
with the system and slowly shift. It is obvious a large part of the country want a different system.
The discussion matters more and finding what the discussion is, but can the USA have a real discussion or just
polarisation?
Wrangler
Well-Known Member
No, the issue is as I said, a freedom fighter refusing to hand over his freedom to the Deep State. If it was a law, making the act mandatory, no candidate would have to sign a document ‘agreeing’ to voluntarily do it.
The basis of a democracy is to allow both sides to pitch for their side, and the people vote, no matter how
stupid or intelligent they are. This is an average position so close issues are ignored but major positions
swing the power to one side or the other.
It all works because individuals we always are so passionate toward our viewpoint, but a democracy has
to balance everything through a system that keeps things ticking along. It is this irrational, uncontrolled
system that forces focus and resolution on things that matter, no matter how much we as individuals want
something else. History shows the leaders fear large shifts, and actually address them, to stop them losing
influence, so the results matter less than the discussion before and the fear of what might follow.
Why did women get the vote and slaves get freed? Why were great wars fought, and medicine advance so
we have conquered so much? Because change and adjustment to it need a democratic expression and dictators
freeze the good changes, because they are just self interested not realising they are destroying the very thing
that makes society prosper and work.
Life is both tragic and beautiful, a gift of the Lord but also judged by how it affects ordinary people.
If democracy fails to listen to the majority, it becomes something else, so the wheel turns.
Wrangler
Well-Known Member
Good question. ‘Discussion’ meme recently showed a purple haired lady schreeching at a guy dressed in a suit.
Politics is the art of what is possible. Negotiation and compromise are at the heart of it, in practice. Refusing to do that, discussion is pointless. Hence, elections, which have consequences.
It’s time for the Deep State to be put down.
"a freedom fighter" - I suspect it is possible to suggest gender pronouns and forcing people to speak a particular way
has caused a simple conflict in peoples head that this stops them freely being themselves.
I agree gender pronouns are absurd, and thinking you can stop hatred by law is foolish. But highlighting the bad affects
on others by diminishing their rights or expression of life because of opinion needs consequences. What is being missed
is there will always be people who will hurt others and be dangerous, and there society needs to discuss how to isolate
and restrict such behaviour.
If the hero can harm anyone they like with no consequences, then how are they a freedom fighter?
If the depraved and evil can rule with impunity where is the justice and truth?
Sadly I think justice and truth are being ignored and power is being exalted.
The Lord of all calls us to simply put justice and truth first, and put ourselves second.
When we are called to not resist the evil man, He means to ignore the issue of pronouns or classifying attitudes as evil,
but seeing how to bring justice and truth to bare. Unfortunately wealth and living to easily corrupts us like the church
of Laodicia and we become neither hot nor cold, lose our saltiness and will be spat out.
How many now live a long time but go through difficult divorces, affairs, family splits, are steeped in pornography and no
longer know what loving people actually is, refusing to resolve hatred and bitterness from their past?
On this altar many churches will fall, as the fruit of their actions comes home. God bless you
Similar threads
