He represents those he died for!...hence why he is called the Son of Man.
Here is where you go wrong, you have no clue what "representative" means according to Scripture.
1. The Meaning of Representation:
The concept of representation in the context of Jesus is that He stood in the place of humanity, taking on their penalty without becoming inherently sinful. This distinction is crucial in understanding biblical theology concerning the sinless nature of Christ.
In Hebrew thought, representation does not imply identity in nature but in role. For instance,
the High Priest represents the people before God during atonement rituals, but he does not become the sins of the people-he only bears them symbolically. Jesus, as a representative, performs a similar role without inheriting the sin nature of humanity.
2. Greek Concept of Representation in the New Testament:
The Greek word often used to describe Christ’s sacrificial role is
ἄντι (anti), meaning “in place of” or “instead of” (cf. Matthew 20:28, Mark 10:45). This conveys the idea that Christ took on the penalty on behalf of others but did not become identical in nature to sinful humanity.
In 2 Corinthians 5:21, a key text often used in discussions like this, we read:
Greek (2 Corinthians 5:21):
"Τὸν μὴ γνόντα ἁμαρτίαν ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν ἁμαρτίαν ἐποίησεν, ἵνα ἡμεῖς γενώμεθα δικαιοσύνη Θεοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ."
"He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
The phrase "made Him who knew no sin to be sin" (ἁμαρτίαν ἐποίησεν) can be misleading if not understood properly. The key lies in understanding ἁμαρτίαν (hamartian), often interpreted in this context not as Jesus becoming sin in essence, but
becoming a sin offering on behalf of humanity, which is more in line with Old Testament sacrificial language.
Something F2F knows nothing about-sadly.
3. Hebrew Concepts of Sin Offerings (Leviticus 16):
In the Hebrew Scriptures, the sin offering is a substitute that
bears the penalty of sin, not the sin itself. The goat in the Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) ritual, for example,
did not become the sins of Israel but rather bore them, carrying them away into the wilderness (cf. Leviticus 16:10).
The Hebrew word כָּפַר (kaphar), meaning to cover, atone, or make amends, reflects the idea of atonement through
substitution rather than
transformation. The same idea applies to Christ as a representative: He atoned for sins without becoming sinful.
4. The Son of Man and Representation:
When Jesus is called the Son of Man (בֶּן־הָאָדָם, ben ha’adam in Hebrew, and ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου in Greek), it emphasizes His solidarity with humanity
without implying that He inherited sinful nature. The term "Son of Man" in the Gospels, especially in Daniel 7:13-14, connects Jesus with the figure who represents all people before God and receives authority, glory, and sovereign power. In representing humanity, Jesus does not become sinful but instead fulfills the righteous requirements of the Law on behalf of humanity.
5. Romans 5: Representation and Federal Headship:
Romans 5:12-21 contrasts Adam's role as the federal head of fallen humanity with Christ as the representative of redeemed humanity. Here, the Greek word ὑπέρ (hyper), often translated as "for" or "on behalf of," is crucial. Paul describes Christ’s act of righteousness as being on behalf of those He represents (Romans 5:19: δι’ ὑπακοῆς τοῦ ἑνὸς, "through the obedience of the One"). Christ represents humanity in His obedience, just as Adam represented humanity in his disobedience.
Paul’s language shows that Christ does not inherit sin but rather reverses the effects of sin by becoming the obedient representative. His role as the second Adam means that through His obedience, not sin, He brings life and righteousness (Romans 5:19).
To sum this up in a nutshell for you F2F--
To represent someone does not necessitate becoming identical to them in nature. In the biblical understanding, Jesus represented sinful humanity without becoming sinful Himself. He bore the consequences of sin, acting as the sin offering and fulfilling the role of a perfect substitute, as seen in both the Hebrew sacrificial system and the Greek New Testament language of atonement.
Therefore, it is essential to distinguish between representation and inherent transformation-Jesus was not made sinful but was made a sin offering to bring reconciliation between God and humanity.
Christ’s identification with humanity through His title Son of Man and His role as a sin offering does not imply that He became sinful in essence, but rather that He served as the perfect, sinless substitute who bore the penalty of sin on behalf of those He came to save (Isaiah 53:4-6).
You and I are NOT on the same page.
J.