Super Kal
Member
- Nov 27, 2007
- 290
- 36
- 28
- 41
That's why the testimony of Papias is so important. Both Eusebius and Irenaeus quote from Papias, and those are the only fragments that we have of his writings, and Irenaeus quotes from Papias, and it says:Thanks for your effort…really too much he said, he said…
I am content with what Jesus said first hand and his Apostles who heard first hand….and Christ Jesus’ Offering to Give His Understanding to “HIS” Church, of which I joined a long time ago..
God bless you.
Glory to God,
Taken
"As the elders who saw John the disciple of the Lord remembered that they had heard from him how the Lord taught in regard to those times, and said]: "The days will come in which vines shall grow, having each ten thousand branches, and in each branch ten thousand twigs, and in each true twig ten thousand shoots, and in every one of the shoots ten thousand clusters, and on every one of the clusters ten thousand grapes, and every grape when pressed will give five-and-twenty metretes of wine. And when any one of the saints shall lay hold of a cluster, another shall cry out, I am a better cluster, take me; bless the Lord through me.' In like manner, [He said] that a grain of wheat would produce ten thousand ears, and that every ear would have ten thousand grains, and every grain would yield ten pounds of clear, pure, fine flour; and that apples, and seeds, and grass would produce in similar proportions; and that all animals, feeding then only on the productions of the earth, would become peaceable and harmonious, and be in perfect subjection to man."
Fragment iv.
biblehub.com
Now, I have no reason to believe that this isnt true... I believe that Papias quoted from Jesus, and this is one of the very few writings that we have from an extra biblical source, from a person who lived in the time of Jesus and the time of the Apostles, and Papias listened to the Apostle John, and the Apostle John said that Jesus made these sayings, I believe that.
Now, like I said, I am a pre millennialist, and I agree that you can derive premillennialism from the Scriptures, but another reason, one of the main reasons, that people have believed premillennialism in the past was because of the oral teachings that one was taught from Apostle, to student, to student...
As a matter of fact, that's what the term "apostolic succession" originally meant. it was not the carrying of the title of Apostle from person to person, it was the teaching of the truth that was transferred from person to person.
I'm not Catholic, and I'm not Eastern Orthodox, both of their definitions of what "apostolic succession" is, is wrong. Roman Catholicism gets it more wrong than Eastern Orthodox, because Catholicism focuses on the title of pope, and the eastern Orthodox focuses on the title apostle. In reality, it's just simply the transfer of teaching of truth from teacher to student.
David Bercot Does a great job In his book The Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs indexing and clarifying what apostolic succession is, and what the early church said it was, and how they used it.
But please don't misunderstand me, I am not saying that the reason we should hold premillennialism is simply because it was taught by the early church...
I am saying that we should hold to premillennialism because it is found within the scriptures, the fact that the earliest church taught it is not a hindrance to this truth, it strengthens this truth, because it shows the accuracy of this doctrine, because if Jesus did teach it, then this teaching would be reflected in the students of the Apostles... and it is reflected in the students of the Apostles.