sure
I do want you to know, though, so that we're all on the same page...
I affirm premillennialism, I'm not saying it's wrong... I agree with the early church and their belief in premillennialism...
after all, the Apostle John had two known students of his own, Polycarp of Smyrna and Ignatius of Antioch.
Polycarp had his own student as well, Irenaeus
Irenaeus also had his own student, Hippolytus
it was from Hippolytus that we get the first interpretation that Daniel 9:27 is referencing the seven year tribulation period
one doesnt have to be a Dispensationalist in order to be a premillennial
Eusebius, in regards to Papias, who was a premillennialist:
Ecclesiastical History (book III, ch. 39)
“The same person, moreover, has set down other things as coming to him from unwritten tradition, amongst these some strange parables and instructions of the Savior, and some other things of a more fabulous nature. Amongst these he says that there will be a millennium after the resurrection from the dead, when the personal reign of Christ will be established on earth.”
"To these [writings] belong [Papias's] statement that there will be a period of some thousand years after the resurrection of the dead, and that the kingdom of Christ will be set up in material form on this very earth. I suppose he got these ideas through a misunderstanding of the apostolic accounts, not perceiving that the things said by them were spoken mystically in figures."
"For he appears to have been of very limited understanding, as one can see from his discourses. But it was due to him that so many of the Church Fathers after him adopted a like opinion, urging in their own support the antiquity of the man; as for instance Irenaeus and any one else that may have proclaimed similar views."(Ecc. History, 3.39)
"It leads them [believers] to hope for small and mortal things in the kingdom of God and for things such as exist now.”
Eusebius of Caesarea, the Roman Empire, and the Fulfillment of Biblical Prophecy: Reassessing Byzantine Imperial Eschatology in the Age of Constantine - Volume 90 Issue 3
www.cambridge.org
Eusebius himself was an amillennialist. He also followed in the footsteps of Origen, highly regarded Origen, and believed that Matthew 24 was a fulfillment of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD... in other words, he was a preterist.