Aunty Jane
Well-Known Member
So why just four times out of thousands?As far as the KJV is concerned, tey have indicated where YHWH occurs by using LORD and GOD.
Isa 42:8….Tanakh….
8 I am the Lord, that is My Name; and My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to the graven images. | חאֲנִ֥י יְהֹוָ֖ה ה֣וּא שְׁמִ֑י וּכְבוֹדִי֙ לְאַחֵ֣ר לֹֽא־אֶתֵּ֔ן וּתְהִלָּתִ֖י לַפְּסִילִֽים: |
KJV…
”I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.”
It follows the Jewish tradition of failing to recognize the name of Jehovah/Yahweh.
If one had to put the divine name forward, why not that verse? God’s name is not “the LORD”….
Exodus 3: 15 too is a strange omission….In the Hebrew, God’s name is in plain sight….
Jewish Tanakh…
15 And God said further to Moses, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'The Lord God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever, and this is how I should be mentioned in every generation.” | טווַיֹּ֩אמֶר֩ ע֨וֹד אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶל־משֶׁ֗ה כֹּ֣ה תֹאמַר֘ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל֒ יְהֹוָ֞ה אֱלֹהֵ֣י אֲבֹֽתֵיכֶ֗ם אֱלֹהֵ֨י אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִצְחָ֛ק וֵֽאלֹהֵ֥י יַֽעֲקֹ֖ב שְׁלָחַ֣נִי אֲלֵיכֶ֑ם זֶה־שְּׁמִ֣י לְעֹלָ֔ם וְזֶ֥ה זִכְרִ֖י לְדֹ֥ר דֹּֽר: |
KJV….
“15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.”
If ever there were verses that invited the Tetragrammaton….those two should have been chosen…..can there be a reason why only four times we see any attempt to make God’s name known in the KJV?
I use a variety of Bibles myself because I like to do research and analyze various passages so that I get a variety of renderings and can cross check with the concordance and see how a word is rendered in English, taking into account the phrasing as well, which can be quite different to English phrasing.As far as Bibles are concerned I read from the RV/KJV Interlinear, both at home and at our meeting. I also have next to me a NASB Study Bible at our meetings for quicker reference, and this also contains a Lexicon for major words and Strongs. On my computer I run Logos8 Bible Program and have purchased many translations. The function "Power Lookup" will give the translation of a particular verse in every Bible that is loaded. Do you almost exclusively use the NWT?
I have found the NWT to be superior to any other translation because the divine name is retained in all the places where it was substituted, and trinitarian bias is omitted when the translation is true to the meaning of the original language.
Our online Bible is updated regularly with added information as it comes to light.
Who told you otherwise? We deal with the misunderstanding of others on a regular basis, so nothing really surprises us any more. I imagine that Jesus and his apostles had to deal with the same problem….he actually warned them that there would be those who told outright lies about them….(Matt 5:11-12) but not to fear because God knows the truth and those who deliberately mislead others by telling half truths and employing slander are showing themselves to be the ones who are misled.I am encouraged by this, commendable.
For us there is no issue…..it’s all yours.Did you notice the two different vowel ponts on the YHWH Name?
You are avoiding the issue again.
I showed you Strongs definition and there are several meanings…not just those two. “Cautious” is not out of the definition’s spectrum at all.The JW literature also applies the translation "cautious" instead of the correct translation "subtil" or "crafty".
In the light of what Paul wrote at 1 Cor 1:10, there is no room for ebb and flow of people or ideas….all must be in agreement, and there is to be one authority who determines the teachings of the entire group, as it was in original Christianity. Agreeing to disagree is not the Christian way…all must be on the same page…if not then God’s spirit is not guiding you.In our meeting we have much ebb and flow of people and ideas. My impression is that the JWs must conform to what is dictated by the GB, and any change is eventually allowed and conveniently claimed to be "new light"
Does your church have a name? Bible Students, perhaps?
We take care of both….it’s not a case of choosing one over the other. The preaching work was a command, not an option. Loving our brothers and promoting spiritual growth was also not optional.The main JW emphasis is preaching, while our main emphasis is the care and spiritual growth of our members.