Trump ~ guilty
Does not mean the defendant IS guilty.
It simply means a Verdict of guilty was Pronounced in a court proceeding.
Never is a Verdict of “NOT guilty” Pronounced in a court proceeding.
There is an “illusion” the “courts” want to be provided and hear…ALL the FACTS and the TRUTH, being nothing but the Truth.
Facts relevant to particular cases ARE “routinely” with-held, from the ears of the Jury.
Irrelevant “sob stories, feelings, motives, opinions, known liars” ARE “routinely” substituted, unnecessarily to extend and muck up the proceedings.
UnConstitutional Positive and Penal Laws “routinely” are the First muck up in a court proceeding.
And add to THAT, the ignorance of the majority who SIT on a JURY panel, who have no idea which LAWS ARE within the parameter OF the Constitution or Not…and thus sorely unqualified to MAKE decisions based IN (valid/Constitutional) Law, rather than personal thoughts, opinions and feelings.
How many people end up in a jury pool selection process? Hundreds for any given case.
How are they selected to be in pool?
Many States…If they have a valid driver’s license.
How many of those “hundreds” in the “pool”, do you have a general guess have EVER WENT to a Law Library….opened a Law Book and Read a Law…and Read the Bill for the Intent of that Law…and Read the corresponding Regulation for that Law?
The Law of the Land…ie the US Constitution, could be hand written on NINE SHEETS of notebook paper.
Within the LIMITS of the US Constitution, Law “makers” ARE LIMITED within such Boundaries, to actually MAKE Laws.
The US “presently” has 50-53 (no one seems to concretely know for sure)…50 for sure VOLUMES ….yes individual BOOKS….of Statutes … ALL promulgated within the LIMIT of the TINY US Constitution Document!
LOL nah!
Thousands of UN-Constitutional Laws are contained within those 50- (-51, 52, 53) Volume's of Law Books.
Even when Positive Laws are Repealed….there ARE cases where the Penalty Law FOR the (Repealed) Positive Law still remains and IS USE Against Citizens!
IS IT THE JOB of a Government Servant to INFORM the People at Large, WHAT the Law says? No. WHAT Laws are Repealed? No.
What Laws ARE UnConstitutional? No.
When the People at Large ELECT Ignorant, greedy, sly, people to REPRESENT them… Why expect any thing other than an Ignorant, greedy, sly, person to REPRESENT their own GREEDY INTEREST FIRST?
An UnConstitutional Law, is NO LAW…
Can a JUROR, challenge the Constitutionality of a Law? Yes.
Do they? They are ignorantly not equipped.