Hobie
Well-Known Member
No, it will be the only thing that can separate them from God, which is what they seek and this is granted..Why?
I can't imagine a more horrible thing to blame God for. (slander)
/
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, it will be the only thing that can separate them from God, which is what they seek and this is granted..Why?
I can't imagine a more horrible thing to blame God for. (slander)
/
No worries, those were all great topics as well. Thanks.I apologise, you are right. I forgot that this thread was focused on unbelievers.
Agree.And you are right about ECT being of interest perhaps to unbelievers, even the reason they don't believe. The Bible presents God as one who would value our friendship and love. Even a God who sacrificed Himself for that purpose. There are many who don't believe in a God who would condone ECT. Who find it difficult to think a relationship with such a person could ever develop into one that is deeply personal, confiding, and fully trusting. Difficult to surrender to someone who promises to infinitely incinerate those He chooses to. I don't believe in that God either.
Why?
I can't imagine a more horrible thing to blame God for. (slander)
Say what? No one "seeks" the lake of fire.No, it will be the only thing that can separate them from God, which is what they seek and this is granted..
I don't believe Hobie was suggesting that people want to burn in hell. However, most people who reject salvation in Christ do so because they cannot abide Christianity. They do not want church, they despise holiness, hymn singing is anathema to them, going without sin and appeasing their carnal natures are what they want. But what they don't want is God. Being thrust into heaven and the company of holy angels would to each of them be the ultimate torture. So God gives them what they wantRev. Wombat said:
Thank God for the lake of fire!
Say what? No one "seeks" the lake of fire.
It is a fallacy to claim that God is giving sinners what they truly want when he tosses them in a forever burning hell with no hope of escape.
This fallacy is intended to absolve God of the claimed horrible act by blaming it on the victims.
It also sets up a choice fallacy, as if everyone had a choice. Not true.
/
Sorry to snip this out of the middle of your post.... people who reject salvation in Christ do so because they cannot abide Christianity. They do not want church...
Even believers are seeking God OUTSIDE of the church.I don't believe Hobie was suggesting that people want to burn in hell. However, most people who reject salvation in Christ do so because they cannot abide Christianity. They do not want church, they despise holiness, hymn singing is anathema to them, going without sin and appeasing their carnal natures are what they want. But what they don't want is God.
Again, this is the victim blaming apologetic.Being thrust into heaven and the company of holy angels would to each of them be the ultimate torture. So God gives them what they want
In the beginning there was only 'the church'. It was 'the church', for all of the apostle's lives. The first use of the term "Catholic Church" (literally meaning "universal church") was by the church father Saint Ignatius of Antioch in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans (circa 110 AD).That was my introduction to the three biblical doctrines of the final judgement. And the most appealing of the three to me was UR. (Ultimate Redemption) Also known as Christian Universalism.
In the beginning UNIVERSALISM covered the doctrine just like the first BAPTIST church would have covered being 'the BAPTIST movement'. But with the next 1700 years that UNIVERSALISM doctrine became very morphed.....just like the BAPTIST denomination. That's why I consider UNIVERSALISM to be the same doctrinal OCEAN as BAPTIST denomination. None of the splinters define the whole.
I agree with you as far as you go, but you have omitted one very important factor essential for an individual to be ultimately saved... Faith.In the beginning there was only 'the church'. That was 'the church', of the apostle's lives. The first use of the term "Catholic Church" (literally meaning "universal church") was by the church father Saint Ignatius of Antioch in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans (circa 110 AD).
AFTER all the apostles were supposedly DEAD. (no historical record of John dying).
Over time, the Christian 'church and faith' grew more organized. In 313 AD, the Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, which accepted Christianity: 10 years later, it had become the official religion of the Roman Empire also known as The Roman Catholic church in 313 AD.
On July 16, 1054, Patriarch of Constantinople Michael Cerularius was excommunicated, starting the “Great Schism” that created the two largest denominations in Christianity—the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox faiths.
The Orthodox church does not believe in the Purgatory or the Hell of the Roman Catholic church
In the beginning UNIVERSALISM covered the doctrine just like the first BAPTIST church would have covered being the BAPTIST movement. But with the next 1700 years that doctrine became very morphed.....just like the BAPTIST denomination. That's why I consider UNIVERSALISM to be the same doctrinal OCEAN as BAPTIST. None of the
GOOGLE says; "Though dozens and dozens of Baptist denominations exist, over 90% of Baptists belong to just five groups:" I hope you're getting my point.
You like UR (Ultimate Redemption) which may or may not be a perfect 'doctrine' I don't know. I like UR (Ultimate Reconciliation) Which may or may not be better????
2CO 5:18 All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation;
So, according to scripture ALL of humanity was reconciled BACK to God, because of the Cross of Christ. PERIOD, DONE, OVER. Price paid and God is satisfied concerning the ULTIMATE price of sin for ETERNITY past, present and future.
19 that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation.
Now our message is to tell people that Jesus died for your sins and God is not mad at anyone for their sins because they are FORGIVEN. Then the church says so all yoiu have to do to be saved is accept Jesus as your savior and Your sins WILL BE forgiven!!! Say what???? I thought they WERE forgiven. Where does scripture say the ETERNAL consequence is back in effect?
20 So we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We beseech you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God.
Here is what I preach to unbelievers. You WERE forgiven for the ETERNAL consequence of your sins.....past, present and future. BUT BUT, BUT, if you do sin your are still going to undergo the TEMPORAL consequence for your ETERNALLY forgiven sins. Why? Because the cross never forgave the TEMPORAL consequences. And those consequences were the conseqquences of the first covenant from God to man, in the Garden....."THE LAW OF SIN AND DEATH". Not ETERNAL DEATH, TORTURE, PUNISHMENT, yada, yada, yada. But temporal death here and now. YOU WILL REAP WHAT YOU SOW. That's why you and I have seen "Christians" dying TEMPORALLY all our lives, confessing that lie until they're DEAD....IN Hell, AKA hades, AKA the grave.
![]()
Do you believe in predestination?I agree with you as far as you go, but you have omitted one very important factor essential for an individual to be ultimately saved... Faith.
In a sense that our sanctification is preplanned, yes. As far as salvation is concerned, God has made all the provisions necessary for all mankind to be brought to saving faith in Christ. But not all mankind will avail themselves of the gift offered. They were not predestined to reject it. God wants all men to be saved. That so many will not be saved is not on Him... He will be more disappointed than anyone that so many will die in their sins.Do you believe in predestination?
Can we really make a blanket statement like that? How do we define "all mankind"?As far as salvation is concerned, God has made all the provisions necessary for all mankind to be brought to saving faith in Christ.
Your description talks about FOREKNOWLEDGE IMO. I'm not talking about a "preplanned" 'plan' , that's up to you, to 'work' for salvation. I'm talking about PREDESTINATION and not FOREKNOWLEDGE.In a sense that our sanctification is preplanned, yes. As far as salvation is concerned, God has made all the provisions necessary for all mankind to be brought to saving faith in Christ. But not all mankind will avail themselves of the gift offered. They were not predestined to reject it. God wants all men to be saved. That so many will not be saved is not on Him... He will be more disappointed than anyone that so many will die in their sins.
Totally agreed....until the last line.There shall be a people
who are to soon to be revealed
in the Spirit of the living Christ of God.
They shall walk before God
without sin and blemish or any iniquity.
In the Glory of God to the Glory of God.
They shall worship in Spirit and Truth
and walk in His Light. They shall have
the Light of Life.
They shall obey in Spirit and Truth
and witness to the Spirit of Truth.
They shall dwell in all the beauty of Holiness
unto the Holiness of God. And the sweet fragrance
of the Spirit of holiness shall dwell upon them
at all times before the Lord God.
They shall bless and love the Lord
with all they do with all their hearts
with all their minds and with all their souls
with all their strength.
They shall fulfill the Commandments of Jesus the Christ.
They are sent by God to destroy the works
of the children of the devil.
They shall prevail and overcome the temptations
of the world and slay the children of the devil
with the Righteousness of their lives
by the Spirit of their God.
They shall open the door for the return
of the King of Kings from heaven to earth.
They and they alone shall have the blessing of the Lord.
They are The Children of The God Most High.
I said...As far as salvation is concerned, God has made all the provisions necessary for all mankind to be brought to saving faith in Christ...and I believe that is an accurate statement.Can we really make a blanket statement like that?
Okay, thanks for the clarification, and the provided scriptures.I said...As far as salvation is concerned, God has made all the provisions necessary for all mankind to be brought to saving faith in Christ...and I believe that is an accurate statement.
So do you believe 2Peter 3:9 which you quote? What I'm 'hearing' in reading that verse is this; it's GOD'S WILL vs YOUR WILL. And scripture isn't betting on 'your will' beating the will of GOD. And what do we need an "EVERLASTING GOSPEL" for in Revelation 14:6? I thought it only lasts until you die, according to nominal Christianity.I said...As far as salvation is concerned, God has made all the provisions necessary for all mankind to be brought to saving faith in Christ...and I believe that is an accurate statement.
"God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance". 2 Peter 3:9
"For God so loved the world, that He sent His only begotten Son, that whosoever should believe in Him, shall have everlasting life". John 3;16
KJV Ezekiel 33:11
11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
KJV Luke 24:47
47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem
KJV Revelation 14:6
6 And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people,
.
In responding to your agnostic friend's perspective and considering the context of his experiences, it's essential to approach the conversation with empathy and understanding. Here are some points to consider when discussing the need for a relationship with God, especially with someone who identifies as agnostic:My agnostic friend acknowledges that some people need something, like religion, to help them get along in life.
He considers himself to be in the group that doesn't need something, like religion, to help him get along in life.
I think this is his polite way of saying, crutches are fine for those who need them, but he doesn't need one.
Ironically, he walks using a cane. - LOL
Humor aside, how would you respond? Why do we need a relationship with God?
Or, more to the point, why does he need a relationship with God? Remember, he is agnostic,
so appeals to the existence of God and the reliability of the Bible have little bearing.
He was raised Lutheran, baptized and confirmed in the church.
Stopped going to church at some point. Married a Catholic woman that was also estranged from the church.
Which ended in a nasty divorce which nearly destroyed my friend. I have been an important support for him.
He is now remarried to a Protestant Christian who is also estranged from the church, but has a relationship with God.
/ cc: @ChristisGod @mailmandan @Lizbeth @quietthinker @amadeus @David in NJ @Hillsage @Lambano @Peterlag @marks @1stCenturyLady @St. SteVen
Thanks for your thoughtful and detailed post.In responding to your agnostic friend's perspective and considering the context of his experiences, it's essential to approach the conversation with empathy and understanding. Here are some points to consider when discussing the need for a relationship with God, especially with someone who identifies as agnostic:
Meaning and Purpose:
Many people find a sense of meaning, purpose, and fulfillment through their relationship with God. It provides a framework for understanding the deeper questions of life and one's purpose in the world.
Comfort and Support:
A relationship with God can offer comfort and support, especially during challenging times. It becomes a source of strength and solace in the face of life's difficulties.
Moral and Ethical Framework:
For those with a belief in God, a religious framework often provides a moral and ethical foundation. It helps shape values and guides decision-making, contributing to a sense of integrity and righteousness.
Community and Connection:
Being part of a religious community can offer a sense of belonging and connection. It provides opportunities for shared values, mutual support, and a network of relationships that can be enriching.
Personal Transformation:
Some people experience personal transformation through their relationship with God. It can bring about positive changes in character, habits, and outlook on life.
Given your friend's agnostic stance and past experiences, it's important to approach this conversation with sensitivity. Instead of directly appealing to the existence of God or the reliability of the Bible, consider sharing personal stories or testimonies of individuals who have found meaning, strength, and transformation through their relationship with God.
You might also emphasize the idea that everyone's journey is unique, and what works for one person may not work for another. If he has questions or concerns, be open to listening without judgment and encourage a respectful dialogue about spirituality and faith.
Finally, your role as a supportive friend has likely been significant in his life. Continue to be a source of understanding and encouragement, respecting his beliefs while gently sharing the positive impact that a relationship with God has had on others.
If he is open to further exploration, you can suggest exploring these topics in a non-confrontational manner, perhaps through literature, podcasts, or discussions that present various perspectives on spirituality and meaning in life.
Are there better reasons to follow Christ, other than we need a crutch?
This is the best place to be. We NEED Him! We can't do anything without Him.I suppose at least it's good to know how badly I'm limping and need a crutch.