Right, well, like I said, it is what it is.Thank you for voicing your opinion.
Amen, and amen....Praise God that he has saved us from eternal damnation.
Grace and peace to you.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Right, well, like I said, it is what it is.Thank you for voicing your opinion.
Amen, and amen....Praise God that he has saved us from eternal damnation.
Fully man, but not corrupted by sin. He didn't have that secret part inside like we do that wants evil.He was fully man... but also fully God.
We've been recreated in Christ is righteousness and true holiness. God rebirthed us clean. And now we are in process of renewing our minds to be able to live that way.Otherwise we would now be sinless also (instead of, for now, no longer being condemned for our sin... because our our having been imputed the righteousness of Christ. Right?
I meant to "give no offense" and when I respond with a scripture I do so, not to say my "humble opinion is right and your opinion is WRONG!!! I sincerely need to know what your take is on that verse from your studies which obviously differ from mine. I want to know if I have missed a 'leaf un-turned' in the verses I have compared to others whose opinions are different. And if all you offer is opinion then I have no reason to change my opinion.Idk why people say these things. "Did this come from scripture, or some church teaching?" Just sharing information to consider, whether you took it all in or not... I cant tell. And if we can't freely think and decide for ourselves, and share with one another, idk what the point is in sharing thoughts, or information about the bible anyway. People tend to get so defensive over 'thats my bible, and these are my beliefs and if you dont believe like this; shame on you!" Is a response that can be sometimes given.
Sure. I have agreed many times, and still do, and always will... :)Fully man, but not corrupted by sin.
It's not about "wanting" anything. :) It's about the innate inability, in and of ourselves, to resist. And Jesus, in His humanness, had that, but also had, in His Godliness, the innate ability, in and of Himself, to resist and remain uncorrupted by sin. And the latter "won out" :)... because, in His Godliness, He was more powerful ~ able to overcome His humanness ~ and infinitely so, because He was God even in His humanness. And this is why He is able to reconcile us to the Father, by the imputation of His righteousness to us, even though we have no righteousness of our own.He didn't have that secret part inside like we do that wants evil.
Sure. Agree.Adam sinned, and when he sinned, he became corrupted by sin.
Ah, now this statement, in and of itself, is conflicted... presents conflict. I'll just say that Adam is at the head of Christ's genealogy, so He was the Son of Man, as He even called Himself. But He was also the Son of God....Christ was not "in Adam" that He likewise inherited from Adam.
Absolutely. And Christ was never dead as we were (and as many who walk among us now are).All in Christ are made alive.
No, there is no conflict. He is the Last Adam, the Second Adam, He is not from Adam. This is the heart of the matter. And when we are reborn we are no longer in Adam, because we have been immersed into Christ. Being in Christ is to share His life, His kind of life. We were in Adam, and shared in his kind of life, which was corrupted by sin, and ended in death. Now we are in Christ, which is righteous and holy, and is eternal life.Ah, now this statement, in and of itself, is conflicted... presents conflict. I'll just say that Adam is at the head of Christ's genealogy, so He was the Son of Man, as He even called Himself. But He was also the Son of God.
No lie. I find harmony in these passages, and it seems pretty clearly stated. You just need to take every word seriously, as if God were saying exactly what He means.I mean, I get the difficulty, and anyone who says he or she has no difficulty with it is either lying to others or lying to himself/herself or both.
is it a sin nature to desire pre eminence above all . GOD DESIRES ALL PRE EMINENCE , ALL GLORY .Not at all!
Jesus was NOT corrupted by sin. That's what a "sin nature", as people call it, is. That claim is, to me, blasphemy.
The truth is, "sin nature" is something men say, not something the Bible says.
Much love!
His birth mother was from adam and eve .@marks .
Just trying to get some clarity here, Brother.
You said......He is the Last Adam, the Second Adam, He is not from Adam.
Was Jesus birth mother from the first Adam?
Your statement above presents conflict. Inadvertently ~ I know you don't mean it to be conflicting, but it is.No, there is no conflict.
Ritajanice gets it... :)He is the Last Adam, the Second Adam, He is not from Adam. This is the heart of the matter.
Right, but not yet fully; that will come when Christ returns. Using Peter's words in 1 Peter 1:3-5, We are both saved ~ "born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead..." ~ and being saved ~ "...to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, who by God’s power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."And when we are reborn we are no longer in Adam, because we have been immersed into Christ.
<chuckle> Well, Jesus did die on the Cross... :) But sure, as God, He did not need a savior... because... He is ~ is ~ the Savior... the Father's Christ. Here again, there are two senses to this, the second being that He did save Himself, in His humanness, in fully and perfectly keeping God's Law, and remaining without ~ uncorrupted by ~ sin.Christ, were He "in Adam", would be subject to death, and would Himself need a savior.
Yeah, I'm not saying you're actually lying, marks. :)No lie.
Okay. :)I find harmony in these passages, and it seems pretty clearly stated.
LOL! You say that as if I don't... :) Yes, God meant what He said, and He said what He meant. Thanks be to God.You just need to take every word seriously, as if God were saying exactly what He means.
Brother....Jesus grew in Mary’s womb did he not?His birth mother was from adam and eve .
But JESUS was long before adam and eve ever were
Yes, I believe so.@marks .
Just trying to get some clarity here, Brother.
You said......He is the Last Adam, the Second Adam, He is not from Adam.
Was Jesus birth mother from the first Adam?
Who says that "close personal connection" was lost the moment they ate, OR even in the 24 hour period after they ate? Does that come from scripture or just the church????
My scripture I am presently basing my opinion on is this;
GEN 4:16 Then Cain went away from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, east of Eden.
My thought goes to how "ashamed" they were, because earlier it said;My thought goes to how afraid they became after partaking of the fruit.
God Arraigns Adam and Eve
8Then the man and his wife heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the breeze of the day, and they hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden. 9 But the LORD God called out to the man, “Where are you?” 10“I heard Your voice in the garden,” he replied, “and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid myself.”…
To me, there is some type of connection of once being innocent in front of God, which changed into being guilty, and afraid. There seems to be a loss of connection.
Shame, fear, and fleeing and hiding (Pr 28:1; Heb 10:38,39; 1 Jn 2:28, 3:23,24, 5:21; Rv 3:17, 16:15).My thought goes to how afraid they became after partaking of the fruit.
God Arraigns Adam and Eve
8Then the man and his wife heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the breeze of the day, and they hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden. 9 But the LORD God called out to the man, “Where are you?” 10“I heard Your voice in the garden,” he replied, “and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid myself.”…
To me, there is some type of connection of once being innocent in front of God, which changed into being guilty, and afraid. There seems to be a loss of connection.
It's both: as you say, we really are a new creation, and the old really has gone, and yet we are to lay aside the old self and put the new self on.If i am in Christ I have been made new, I am a new creation. The old has gone. There is no more old me.
2 Corinthians 5:17
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!
Being Born Again is also, a Living Spiritual birth, that only God can do through the Spirit...we have received the Holy Spirit, who lives in our spirit...we are ALIVE in Christ, he brings us Alive in our spirit.Being born again is to be born into the new line.
Romans 8:2 KJV
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
Romans 7:17 KJV
Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Audio Crossref Comment Greek Verse (Click for Chapter) New International Version Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. New Living Translation Humans can reproduce only human life, but the Holy Spirit gives birth to spiritual life. |
My thought goes to how "ashamed" they were, because earlier it said;
GEN 2:25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.
My thoughts early on were also, what was covering them before and was now LOST. I can't prove where I've landed but I believe they lost the robe of righteousness that comes from walking in complete obedience to the SPIRIT. That's what made them "LIVING souls" instead of dying souls they became when naked.
GEN 3:8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day:
Another thing that ties in here for me is this; One day (30+? years ago) I was going to start with Genesis again and I felt led to look up every word I was 'drawn' to in STRONG's. And it was Great up until Gen 3:8 and the word "COOL". I skipped over that word even after I did feel 'drawn' a tiny bit. And I'm sure it was tiny because I couldn't even imagine how another Heb def. use of that word could amount to any thing in the sentence. I was thinking of possible alternatives as being "Chilly day' 'Fall-ish day' etc. But I felt a stronger nudge and obeyed. Do you know what that Hebrew word is? It is RUWACH and in the OT it is translated 227 times as
SPIRIT and 1 time as "COOL". Let's reread Gen. 3:8 with eyes that will hopefully see what I saw so long ago.
GEN 3:8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the SPIRIT of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.
I'll stop here. Hopeful that your thinking about a lot of things like did. I've never heard anybody ever teach this word's definition until a couple of years ago. And I can't help but wonder if he heard it through some grapevine whose roots are (30+) years old..... :cool:
It could have happened.
Gnite.
Thank you sharing those extra verses.Shame, fear, and fleeing and hiding (Pr 28:1; Heb 10:38,39; 1 Jn 2:28, 3:23,24, 5:21; Rv 3:17, 16:15).
Genesis 3
7And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; so they sewed together fig leaves and made coverings for themselves.
8Then the man and his wife heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the breeze of the day, and they hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden.
9But the LORD God called out to the man, “Where are you?”
10“I heard Your voice in the garden,” he replied, “and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid myself.”
I think the SPIRIT they weren't following the day they ate, wasn't the Holy Spirit of the LORD GOD. It was the spirit from God he breathed into their bodies giving that body immortal life. And they could not walk away from that spirit which gave the flesh the 'animating' life force of all flesh creatures.Still they lost connection, and they were lead out of the Garden and they were separated from that spiritual life with God openly expressing and letting himself be heard, in this "heaven and earth like scene", the same goes for the natinn of Isarel they had to sacrfice every year and when God accepted it, he would show up in the temple, as a cloud. There is still separation today, however, through faith and belief, you restablish the connection with Yahava, because his son replaced what Adam lost in the garden,. Now everyone has access to Yahava, freely due to looking at the creation which he has created and looking at someone who they deem greater than themselves.
Ultimately I do believer that Adam and Eve lost connection with Yahava, that day, they left the garden they no longer had spiritual life, perhaps it started from the first knowing - that they disobeyed God, they were no longer innoncent, and they were sent into a world that was fallen - though today it is has been reconciled according to one of the writers in the bible.
That is my opinion, though and no on has to believe it . I could be wrong.