not all i am sure the trans i do question, BTW do you support the lgbt movementsaying that LGBT individuals are the equivalent of pedophiles and serial killers is a lie.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
not all i am sure the trans i do question, BTW do you support the lgbt movementsaying that LGBT individuals are the equivalent of pedophiles and serial killers is a lie.
You claim something is a fact without proof. How do you know what the Gateway Pundit published as President Biden's proclamation is a fraud? You got nothing.the fact remains that what the Gateway Pundit published as President Biden's proclamation is a fraud.
I linked to the real document in post #53.You claim something is a fact without proof. How do you know what the Gateway Pundit published as President Biden's proclamation is a fraud? You got nothing.
Let's see the President supports stopping discriminatory, physical and emotional abuse. AND he wants programs designed to prevent youth suicide AND he wants to protect families. The horror....What Biden is quoted as saying in the Gateway Pundit is certainly believable as it is consistent with his stated support of the sin of sexual perversion. FACT SHEET: President Biden to Sign Historic Executive Order Advancing LGBTQI+ Equality During Pride Month | The White House
what do you think the "lgbt movement" is?not all i am sure the trans i do question, BTW do you support the lgbt movement
There is no need to make the "lbgt" topic of discussion lengthy here!!what do you think the "lgbt movement" is?
yeah , i never said follow them either . THEY all in bed together . THE LIE is being sold . And you have BOUGHT the LIEStormy Daniels?
ITS PRIDE AND REBELLION TO GOD . I SHUN its movment to hades . Notice i said its movement .what do you think the "lgbt movement" is?
OH i never said LOTT was perfect . But what he did concerning his daughters , at least showedI don't know about you thinkin' it wasn't odd--I think maybe you decided to go with what Wrangler wrote. You are just writing stuff.
Lot may be righteous, but the angel had to pull his hand for him to leave Gen19:16 'And while he lingered, the men laid hold upon his hand, and upon the hand of his wife, and upon the hand of his two daughters; the Lord being merciful unto him: and they brought him forth, and set him without the city."
I think some of Sodom had rubbed off on Lot, for why did he stay? He pitched his tent toward Sodom, and must have been aware of their practices.He let his daughters marry some sodomites. I am certain tho he knew God would never allow the people outside the door to assault his other daughters. God certainly was with him, and he knew it.
No. You did not link to a real document in post #53. You posted to a link that slanders the source cited in the OP. Big difference.I linked to the real document in post #53.
do you support the lgbt movement
You inability/unwillingness to answer this question reveals that you are indeed, a Cultural Marxist.what do you think the "lgbt movement" is?
For sure it reveals something has went dead wrong . why IS it such a sin for this church ageYou inability/unwillingness to answer this question reveals that you are indeed, a Cultural Marxist.
Whether or not he be a cultural marxist i know not . But the fact HE answers not the questionYou inability/unwillingness to answer this question reveals that you are indeed, a Cultural Marxist.
Dont go mute now my friend . What do you think about those last two reminders i just brought .You inability/unwillingness to answer this question reveals that you are indeed, a Cultural Marxist.
Spot on.Dont go mute now my friend . What do you think about those last two reminders i just brought .
It is the topic of the thread....There is no need to make the "lbgt" topic of discussion lengthy here!!
nope...the real document. Right from the source. Why are you pretending it's not?No. You did not link to a real document in post #53. You posted to a link that slanders the source cited in the OP. Big difference.