Ronald Nolette
Well-Known Member
Nope the ingredients have remained the same! People do not get to see the boxes of flu shots, shingles shots, pneumonia shots, tetanus shots, MMR shots, T-Dap shots and all the rest, why should the covid shot be different??????This link suggests it was 'really' because they wanted people to go online and look at the latest claims they made. Ha. So did the ingredients change every day? Pretty lame.
But what toxic substance is in the covid vaccine? Second request.
Flu shots kill hundreds of people annually. Why aren't you kicking up a fuss about them? That is a whole lot more people than 20 babies. Oh, I think I know, it is too small a % number for you to bother with. And stop your lying! It was not covered up! It was all in the info the manufacturers handed over to the government. No drug ever releases all the data to the general public until the patent has expired.Whose law? There is no law against killing little people either, so? If a test study resulted in the death of a lot of babies, and was covered up, and that is fine with the law, it doesn't matter at all. The guilt is still there.
So then I guess you think every drug they take to market, they are guilty of murder. Every pharmaceutical ever produced has produced known deaths! YOu live in a fantasy world. Or just entrapped by your own hatred that you cannot see straight.I wasn't talking about the law in this thread, you were. I was pointing out that covering up info regarding little people being killed and proceeding to use the same vaccine on the masses is guity of causing death as far as I am concerned.
That part is opinion. My opinion is that we must conclude we were lied to and that the evidence is coming in that many people have ill effects and death from the shots.
Funny,I knew all that before I got my first shot. Why wasn't I lied to? Teh info was there and the deaths reported as required like the deaths all drugs have in clinical trials. You can conclude what you wish, but as an ambassador for the Lord Jesus- you should be a whole lot more responsible than you are now
Great, in the short term you survived! Let's hope that continues. Obviously a lot of people did not.
.I hope so as well. but Every one should consult with their medical professionals whom you say are liars, and determine if the risks of any medication being considered are outweighed by the benefits it can bring. People die all the time from medications. Just ask chemo patients and those who administer than known toxic brew.
So? Who cares if twiddely dum or twiddely dee reports something, and they have Humpty Dumpty read it?
To be blunt, now you sound like a blithering idiot! I hope you are not one. This is where anyone can get needed info for themselves as to how potentially beneficial or dangerous a medication is for them. If you do not wish to read the reports- that is your issue, I can't help you there.
Stop lying! They did not murder intentionally 22 babies and they did not cover it up! 22 babies died in a voluntary clinical trial, the risks were explained, the mothers did not go into it blind, and all the results were reported as they were supposed to be. You are just bitter because you were not in the loop. Get over yourself.So whacking 22 babies and covering it up is fine with you? Many serial killers (if the tv shows are right) don't have that many victims.
And as you have lied here I guess I wll use your rule and what you say has no meaning then.No. What is attributed to the shot has no meaning if it comes from liars. The little people who died in the study, for example, were listed as something else, remember? 'Resolved non related problems' or whatever term they used!
First answer the question. How many is many? Don't try to dodge answering my question by throwing another question out.How many would it take to make you be open minded?
Now prove they are all honest. Or do you call them honest just because they agree with you?All of the honest ones?
Stop lying! They di dnot cover it up. If they did how would people who got hold of the reports given to all the govt. agencies find out about the deaths? YOU sound like you have yet to complets grammar school, you are not making sense.My material? Showing a link that they covered up results is not my material. What's to study?
![]()
COVID vaccine package insert is blank because up-to-date information is online
Missing context. The paper insert states that it was intentionally left blank and that FDA-authorized fact sheets are available electronically, according to a J&J representative.apnews.com
This link suggests it was 'really' because they wanted people to go online and look at the latest claims they made. Ha. So did the ingredients change every day? Pretty lame.
Whose law? There is no law against killing little people either, so? If a test study resulted in the death of a lot of babies, and was covered up, and that is fine with the law, it doesn't matter at all. The guilt is still there.
I wasn't talking about the law in this thread, you were. I was pointing out that covering up info regarding little people being killed and proceeding to use the same vaccine on the masses is guity of causing death as far as I am concerned.
That part is opinion. My opinion is that we must conclude we were lied to and that the evidence is coming in that many people have ill effects and death from the shots.
Great, in the short term you survived! Let's hope that continues. Obviously a lot of people did not.
If a death dealing substance was tested and covered up that is evidence. There is a difference between avoiding evidence and waiting for it.
So what study shows 20 month old babies need the shots? What study shows all the sudden deaths are totally unrelated to the vaccine agenda? What study shows there is no connection with myocorditis an d other heart issues that skyrocketed lately? What study shows that it is healthy to lock up old people and keep them from visiting family, and that losing your business is good for the economy? Who would even listen to what liars report?? Once they covered up results they should not be listened to at all.
So? Who cares if twiddely dum or twiddely dee reports something, and they have Humpty Dumpty read it?
So whacking 22 babies and covering it up is fine with you? Many serial killers (if the tv shows are right) don't have that many victims.
No. What is attributed to the shot has no meaning if it comes from liars. The little people who died in the study, for example, were listed as something else, remember? 'Resolved non related problems' or whatever term they used!
How many would it take to make you be open minded?
All of the honest ones?
My material? Showing a link that they covered up results is not my material. What's to study?
Even last year there were strange goings on
"
- At Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 babies were allegedly stillborn in a period of 24 hours; all of their mothers had received a COVID-19 injection
- At a rally outside the hospital, doctors launched an official complaint with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police against executives at the College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC, alleging conflicts of interest influencing their policies, decisions and statements made to the people of British Columbia
- Scotland has also experienced an unusual rise in infant death rates; during September 2021, at least 21 babies under 4 weeks died — a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births, up from an average of 2 per 1,000 births
- As of November 12, 2021, there were 2,620 cases of fetal death or stillbirth among women who received a COVID-19 injection reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
- The CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected “presents falsely reassuring statistics”
- When the risk of miscarriage was recalculated to include all women injected prior to 20 weeks’ gestation, the incidence was seven to eight times higher than the original study indicated, with a cumulative incidence of miscarriage ranging from 82% to 91%
![]()
Sudden Surge in Stillbirths and Menstrual Changes
By Dr. Joseph Mercola (via Mercola) Story at-a-glance At Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 babies were allegedly stillborn in a period of 24 hours; all of their mothers h…thetattyjournal.org
So it all depends who is doing the stats or calculating.
And I would whole heartedly agree that these are events that are alarming and require much further research and study and investigation. Not seeing any cover up here, for if it was- how did you get your hands on this?
Once again I am not saying that there is not a risk in getting the shot- for certain groups there is definitely. That is why people should consult their physicians and determine if the benefits outweigh the risks.
Your highlighted line is a load of BS. Nowhere on this planet will you find 82-91% of pregnant women who got a covid shot having miscarriages. Nowhere! As I gave you the data- the number of miscarriages that can be directly attributed to civd shots is .007% of all miscarriages in the U.S.