in every box? a few boxes? what. every manufacturer? In every run? But we do not get to see the box. that is seen by the administrators of the shot. Covid vaccines are not given unsho to people to take home so the ingredient label thing is a red herring.
Missing context. The paper insert states that it was intentionally left blank and that FDA-authorized fact sheets are available electronically, according to a J&J representative.
apnews.com
This link suggests it was 'really' because they wanted people to go online and look at the latest claims they made. Ha. So did the ingredients change every day? Pretty lame.
Says you but not the law.
Whose law? There is no law against killing little people either, so? If a test study resulted in the death of a lot of babies, and was covered up, and that is fine with the law, it doesn't matter at all. The guilt is still there.
Now if you wish to talk about the rightness or wrongness of the law that is another discussion for another thread. And it was not high death numbers. It was 22 out of 50 and in the general population the 5 is much much much lower!
I wasn't talking about the law in this thread, you were. I was pointing out that covering up info regarding little people being killed and proceeding to use the same vaccine on the masses is guity of causing death as far as I am concerned.
YOu should read the line before your rabid headline--"The public should not jump too conclusions before a full investigation is done".. Too late for you ! YOu jumped of that cliff long time ago.
That part is opinion. My opinion is that we must conclude we were lied to and that the evidence is coming in that many people have ill effects and death from the shots.
I have had 5 shops over 2 1/2 years and I have had no adverse effects. Five years from now? Who knows?
Great, in the short term you survived! Let's hope that continues. Obviously a lot of people did not.
And I will await our proof that the numbers were skewed and dishonest with EVIDENCE and not anecdotes.
If a death dealing substance was tested and covered up that is evidence. There is a difference between avoiding evidence and waiting for it.
Yes the vaccine has caused almost everything the pharmaceutical companies reported globally before the shots were started! They even added other adverse effects as time went on and reported them. IOW they did what they do with every medication which is brought to market. Report and add or subtract as real world data pours in. YOu seem ignorant of how drugs make it to marklet and how they find other side effects other than the ones found in clinical trials.
So what study shows 20 month old babies need the shots? What study shows all the sudden deaths are totally unrelated to the vaccine agenda? What study shows there is no connection with myocorditis an d other heart issues that skyrocketed lately? What study shows that it is healthy to lock up old people and keep them from visiting family, and that losing your business is good for the economy? Who would even listen to what liars report?? Once they covered up results they should not be listened to at all.
adverse effects are reported by the FDA and not the drug companies
So? Who cares if twiddely dum or twiddely dee reports something, and they have Humpty Dumpty read it?
YOu are psychotic over that 40% it was 22 babies.
So whacking 22 babies and covering it up is fine with you? Many serial killers (if the tv shows are right) don't have that many victims.
Now that millions of women who are pregnant have got shot, the number of women who miscarried that can or may be attributed to the shot is a minor minor % of total miscarriages The tiny study produced a huge % but g;lobally teh % is .007% of miscarriages are due to teh shot.
No. What is attributed to the shot has no meaning if it comes from liars. The little people who died in the study, for example, were listed as something else, remember? 'Resolved non related problems' or whatever term they used!
DEfine many. How many are many? what % of researchers in this drug spoke against it.
How many would it take to make you be open minded?
Seeing as you love to use %ages, what is the % of actual researchers and doctors who work on the drug who spoke against it?
All of the honest ones?
As have you by your lack of proving your material with research and studies and trials.
My material? Showing a link that they covered up results is not my material. What's to study?
But 40% of 50 is a far less amount of deaths than 1% of a million
Even last year there were strange goings on
"
- At Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 babies were allegedly stillborn in a period of 24 hours; all of their mothers had received a COVID-19 injection
- At a rally outside the hospital, doctors launched an official complaint with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police against executives at the College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC, alleging conflicts of interest influencing their policies, decisions and statements made to the people of British Columbia
- Scotland has also experienced an unusual rise in infant death rates; during September 2021, at least 21 babies under 4 weeks died — a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births, up from an average of 2 per 1,000 births
- As of November 12, 2021, there were 2,620 cases of fetal death or stillbirth among women who received a COVID-19 injection reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
- The CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected “presents falsely reassuring statistics”
- When the risk of miscarriage was recalculated to include all women injected prior to 20 weeks’ gestation, the incidence was seven to eight times higher than the original study indicated, with a cumulative incidence of miscarriage ranging from 82% to 91%
By Dr. Joseph Mercola (via Mercola) Story at-a-glance At Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 babies were allegedly stillborn in a period of 24 hours; all of their mothers h…
thetattyjournal.org
So it all depends who is doing the stats or calculating.