Buzzfruit
New Member
I'm perfectly content knowing that Scripture is wrong. Thanks for convincing me that you are smarter than GOD.
Now should I worship YOU?
BibleScribe
Now you are really being silly.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'm perfectly content knowing that Scripture is wrong. Thanks for convincing me that you are smarter than GOD.
Now should I worship YOU?
BibleScribe
I'm being honest as to the merit of Scripture. If it's wrong, as you intimate, then obviously you're greater than GOD. So by simple logic, I arrived as you led.
Did you expect otherwise?
BibleScribe
Irony?
It would seem that way.1 Timothy 3
16 ------------ God was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the Spirit, Seen by messengers, Preached among the Gentiles, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory.
It doesn't get any plainer than that.
It would seem that way.
This should be a no brainer.
It should be a "no brainer", but then you'd equally have an explanation for how "God is not tempted". So I'd suggest that you put on your thinking cap, (not the pointed one, -- the flat one, preferably with the college colors), and figure out exactly how Jesus was NOT God. :)
BibleScribe
Christ was God. I know that the flesh and those who think with brains of flesh can't know it. The flesh is all they can understand.
The body of Christ is the Body of God. If you have seen Christ you have seen God. The Spirit of Christ is the Spirit of God. God was On His throne of Heaven and in Christ and guiding the constellations in their seasons and feeding the lions in Africa while fueling the suns of the universe to continue to give their light all at the same time. God is Spirit. He is omnipotent and Omnipresent.
John 14
9 Jesus said to him, ------- He who has seen Me has seen the Father;
I agree that Jesus is GOD, -- and because GOD cannot be tempted, then I guess neither was Jesus.
Does this help your understanding of Scripture? I hope when you delete all those references to Jesus being tempted that you NOT use an Exacto Knife, or a Sharipe, (one removes the other side of the page text, and the second bleeds through to the other side of the page text), but that you use something like "white-out".
To All,
Once again, it's not sufficient to satisfy part of Scripture and violate another. One MUST find a solution which satisfies ALL Scriptural aspects. And apparently my advice in this regard has not been welcomed, so I leave that challenge open for any who can receive the TRUTH from the Holy Spirit, in spite of those closely held false doctrines. :)
BibleScribe
Scripture SAYS he's not God because he was tempted, and God cannot be tempted. So the question is, -- Is the Bible wrong?
And to hear your side of it, apparently it is. However, I would suggest that it's not. I would propose that even though Jesus had his God essence, he laid it aside to become fully man. And so he never exercised ANY God nature as a man. -- Anyone can walk on water (Peter did), and anyone can become light (Moses did).
Thus although this existence as fully man does not deny his God heritage, it does deny his God power. And thus he was a mere mortal, subject to every weakness, every temptation, and even death. But HE overcame death and became the perfect sacrifice for our sins.
Does this help?
BibleScribe
Only a Jew would proclaim that Jesus were not God. There is plenty of proof that has been provided that proves this fact, to deny it is anti-Christian. And you want to tell me that I am an false teacher! Jesus should be the CHRISTians EVERYTHING! We carry His name, and we are to pray in His name. If that doesn't deify something, then I don't really know what else would.It should be a "no brainer", but then you'd equally have an explanation for how "God is not tempted". So I'd suggest that you put on your thinking cap, (not the pointed one, -- the flat one, preferably with the college colors), and figure out exactly how Jesus was NOT God. :)
BibleScribe
I have posted scriptures that say He is God. The Word, who is God became flesh and lived among us, as it says in John 1.
early christians did not view John 1:1 to mean that Jesus was God. The Coptic christians of Egypt made a translation of Johns gospel into their own language back in the 2nd/3rd century. Their language is similar to english in that it is a languages which uses both the definite and indefinite articles.
In John 1:1 they rendered it with an indefinite article this way:
Coptic translation
1:1 ϨΝ ΤЄϨΟΥЄΙΤЄ ΝЄϤϢΟΟΠ ΝϬΙΠϢΑϪЄ, ΑΥѠ ΠϢΑϪЄ ΝЄϤϢΟΟΠ ΝΝΑϨΡΜ ΠΝΟΥΤЄ. ΑΥѠ ΝЄΥΝΟΥΤЄ ΠЄ ΠϢΑϪЄ
In the beginning existed the Word, and the Word existed with God, and the Word was a God.
If we take the coptic christians as an early evidence of how christians understood John 1:1, then there would be no debate on the issue at all.
Scripture SAYS he's not God because he was tempted, and God cannot be tempted. So the question is, -- Is the Bible wrong?
And to hear your side of it, apparently it is. However, I would suggest that it's not. I would propose that even though Jesus had his God essence, he laid it aside to become fully man. And so he never exercised ANY God nature as a man. -- Anyone can walk on water (Peter did), and anyone can become light (Moses did).
Thus although this existence as fully man does not deny his God heritage, it does deny his God power. And thus he was a mere mortal, subject to every weakness, every temptation, and even death. But HE overcame death and became the perfect sacrifice for our sins.
Does this help?
BibleScribe
"Thou shalt have no GODS before me" Quite contradictory in itself i believe. We are told that Jesus is that Word in Revelation 19:11-13early christians did not view John 1:1 to mean that Jesus was God. The Coptic christians of Egypt made a translation of Johns gospel into their own language back in the 2nd/3rd century. Their language is similar to english in that it is a languages which uses both the definite and indefinite articles.
In John 1:1 they rendered it with an indefinite article this way:
Coptic translation
1:1 ϨΝ ΤЄϨΟΥЄΙΤЄ ΝЄϤϢΟΟΠ ΝϬΙΠϢΑϪЄ, ΑΥѠ ΠϢΑϪЄ ΝЄϤϢΟΟΠ ΝΝΑϨΡΜ ΠΝΟΥΤЄ. ΑΥѠ ΝЄΥΝΟΥΤЄ ΠЄ ΠϢΑϪЄ
In the beginning existed the Word, and the Word existed with God, and the Word was a God.
If we take the coptic christians as an early evidence of how christians understood John 1:1, then there would be no debate on the issue at all.
You do not understand the mechanics of the power of sin when you make a statement like that.
Jesus was tempted, but did not sin....
Only a Jew would proclaim that Jesus were not God. ....