Christ's doctrine of justification is neither by faith only nor by works only: Christians are imputed righteousness by faith unto good works inwardly and justified by those good works of faith outwardly.
Scripture speaks of imputed righteousness of faith, not of imputed justification by faith.
Trying to equate imputed righteousness of God by faith with justification of God without works is false: justification of God is not the imputed righteousness of God.
The fundamental error of trusting in Scriptures written by Paul, but not trusting in Scriptures written by James, is due to wanting to see a faith-only doctrine from Paul the apostle, and a salvation by works only from James the apostle.
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Believing that Scripture does not contradict itself, and that both Paul and James are writing Scriptures from Jesus for His doctrine of justification, the rightly dividing the word of truth is necessary to reconcile the Scriptures written by Paul and James.
1. Paul never says we are justified by faith alone. That is an added word to the Scripture by man.
2. James is saying a definitive Scripture of being justified by works, which is directly contradicting by justification is by faith alone, 'apart from' works.
To the unobjectively reader, this is obvious, but to the subjective reader it is troublesome to the false doctrine of unconditional salvation 'apart from' works, since we cannot be saved by God apart from being justified with God.
The battleground therefore is not the argument of unconditional salvation, nor being saved by faith, but is the doctrine of only being justified by works: we cannot be justified by faith alone, which is never written in Scripture, and apart from works, and directly contradicts Scripture.
Therefore, the real task is to reconcile the apparent contradiction of Scripture written by Paul and James.
Scripture speaks of imputed righteousness of faith, not of imputed justification by faith.
Trying to equate imputed righteousness of God by faith with justification of God without works is false: justification of God is not the imputed righteousness of God.
The fundamental error of trusting in Scriptures written by Paul, but not trusting in Scriptures written by James, is due to wanting to see a faith-only doctrine from Paul the apostle, and a salvation by works only from James the apostle.
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Believing that Scripture does not contradict itself, and that both Paul and James are writing Scriptures from Jesus for His doctrine of justification, the rightly dividing the word of truth is necessary to reconcile the Scriptures written by Paul and James.
1. Paul never says we are justified by faith alone. That is an added word to the Scripture by man.
2. James is saying a definitive Scripture of being justified by works, which is directly contradicting by justification is by faith alone, 'apart from' works.
To the unobjectively reader, this is obvious, but to the subjective reader it is troublesome to the false doctrine of unconditional salvation 'apart from' works, since we cannot be saved by God apart from being justified with God.
The battleground therefore is not the argument of unconditional salvation, nor being saved by faith, but is the doctrine of only being justified by works: we cannot be justified by faith alone, which is never written in Scripture, and apart from works, and directly contradicts Scripture.
Therefore, the real task is to reconcile the apparent contradiction of Scripture written by Paul and James.
Last edited: