How is that?Both. One in three, three in one. Both. :)
Grace and peace!
It can't be both.
God in 3 persons makes 3 gods.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How is that?Both. One in three, three in one. Both. :)
Grace and peace!
Do you ever use scripture?Nope.
What you described is the general call of the Gospel to repent and believe. It goes to everyone, Jew and Gentile alike, an invitation to everyone without limit. All your Scripture citations are such.
But God and God only calls His elect by His Holy Spirit, and these are the ones who are reborn of the Spirit and that subsequently, because of the heart of flesh that they have been given (that has replaced the heart of stone), then come to repentance and belief. And this call, unlike the general call, is effectual without fail.
Grace and peace to you.
You, like many others do not comprehend Pslam 51:5Ah, then how do you understand what David says in Psalm 139, GG? Namely:
"Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me" (Psalm 51:5)
Augustine was right about this, and so was John Calvin, and so are all those that have come after.
Will of decree and Will of command is also known as the Interior will of God and the Exterior will of God.No, man sins (and is culpable for that sin) because he is born with only the sinful nature, because he is descended from Adam, the federal head of the human race, who plunged humanity into this condition when he ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, documented in Genesis 3. God does not "predestinate (man) to sin," otherwise He Himself is capable of sin and even the author of sin, which is a blasphemy and absolutely not the case. As Jonathan Edwards wrote:
"If by ‘the author of sin,’ be meant the sinner, the agent, or the actor of sin, or the doer of a wicked thing... it would be a reproach and blasphemy, to suppose God to be the author of sin."
HOWEVER. Edwards does subsequently say ~ and he is right... :) ~ the following;
"(God is) the permitter... of sin; and at the same time, a disposer of the state of events, in such a manner, for wise, holy and most excellent ends and purposes... If the sun were the proper cause of cold and darkness, it would be the fountain of these things, as it is the fountain of light and heat: and then something might be argued from the nature of cold and darkness, to a likeness of nature in the sun..."
In other words, sin is not the fruit of any positive agency or influence of the most High, but on the contrary, arises from the withholding of his action and energy, and under certain circumstances, necessarily follows on the want of his influence. What this means is that God wills things in two different senses. The Bible demands this by the way it speaks of God’s will in different ways. Edwards uses the terms “will of decree” and “will of command,” and explains that "(God’s) will of decree (or sovereign will) is not His will in the same sense as His will of command (or moral will) is."
How can you state that God wants the happiness of His creatures when most of them He destines to hell?Therefore it is not difficult at all to suppose that the one may be otherwise than the other: His will in both senses is His inclination. But when we say He wills virtue, or loves virtue or the happiness of His creature; thereby is intended that virtue or the creature’s happiness, absolutely and simply considered, is agreeable to the inclination of his nature. His will of decree is his inclination to a thing not as to that thing absolutely and simply, but with reference to the universality of things. So God, though he hates a things as it is simply, may incline to it with reference to the universality of things.
No two sides to the coin in the bible PS.This perception ~ misperception ~ manifests itself among many only because those on the other side of the fence either don't understand or refuse to admit that in the Bible ~ like everywhere else ~ coins always have two sides, and not just one. :)
Grace and peace to you.
Many times I'm told I don't understand Calvinism (the reformed faith).I think when you say it's ridiculous, you have a problem with Calvinism.
John Calvin:
“The will of God is the chief and principal cause of all things.”
“What we must prove is that single events are ordered by God and that every event comes from his intended will. Nothing happens by chance.”
“But where it is a matter of men’s counsels, wills, endeavours, and exertions, there is greater difficulty in seeing how the providence of God rules here too, so that nothing happens but by His assent and that men can deliberately do nothing unless He inspire it.”
IF you're in perfect accord with @Rudometkin then you'll have to accept the fact thatOkay, think what you want. I have no problem with that. Or Calvinism in general. :)
And I'm in perfect accord with what John Calvin has said here.
Grace and peace to you.
It's a total waste of time to discuss Bible truth with Calvinists. Just like it's a total waste of time to discuss any truth with Leftists. They are all steeped in lies. The real issue is "Why are lies more appealing than truth?"IF you're in perfect accord with @Rudometkin then you'll have to accept the fact that
God causes EVERYTHING that happens, including murder, child abuse, disease, etc.
Your top teacher/preachers, theologians, do admit to this BTW...
and with no shame.
You can go back and check for yourself, GG, but what I said was, "(Rudometkin and I) are on the same side regarding John Calvin," and later in that same post (336) that, "I wholeheartedly agree with Calvin's statement quoted (by Rudometkin) above. And in post 340, I said the same thing, that, "...I'm in perfect accord with what John Calvin has said (t)here," in his Institutes, cited by Rudometkin.IF you're in perfect accord with @Rudometkin...
In the sense that God allows, for a time, and even uses ~ but in no way authors or condones ~ the sinful acts of men to accomplish His purposes, I'll allow what you say, ridiculous as it is....then you'll have to accept the fact that God causes EVERYTHING that happens, including murder, child abuse, disease, etc.
No, they don't. See above. You, GodsGrace, like Rudometkin, and some other posters here ~ though your heart possibly be in the right place ~ are overstating things and therefore making untrue statements.your top teacher/preachers, theologians, do admit to this BTW... and with no shame.
Must Be The Biblical Principle Of:"Why are lies more appealing than truth?"
Calvinism vs. Hyper-Calvinism.Okay, think what you want. I have no problem with that. Or Calvinism in general. :)
And I'm in perfect accord with what John Calvin has said here.
Grace and peace to you.
That might be true for some but not most. Some of us simply understand the scriptures differentlyI have found that people who disagree with calvinism, do so because of 1. They think God has the same thought process as they do, or 2. They dont like being told they are sinners, depraved from the beginning.
They tend to think everything about God should be happy, upbeat, and never fearful.
That might be true for some but not most. Some of us simply understand the scriptures differently
Don't feel bad. Mormons and Catholics feel the same way about my understanding of the scriptures. No worries.differently…. Not the word i would have used.
This is an interesting question.It's a total waste of time to discuss Bible truth with Calvinists. Just like it's a total waste of time to discuss any truth with Leftists. They are all steeped in lies. The real issue is "Why are lies more appealing than truth?"
This is silly nonsense LL.I have found that people who disagree with calvinism, do so because of 1. They think God has the same thought process as they do, or 2. They dont like being told they are sinners, depraved from the beginning.
They tend to think everything about God should be happy, upbeat, and never fearful.
Catholics understand the scripture as we do, except for a couple of passages, both having to do with purgatory.Don't feel bad. Mormons and Catholics feel the same way about my understanding of the scriptures. No worries.
This is an interesting question.
Why would someone believe in a God that hates His creation enough to send the majority to hell?
That programs us like a bunch of robots?
Who will never get any true love from us because true love is given freely and not programed.
Why would this god even create us to begin with?
So He could play games with us?
WHY are the lies of God's character so readily accepted by some?
Interesting question...
I do think judgement day will be different for everyone, but for me personally, i cant think of a worse day. Nothing is scarier to me than facing God.
Well, I'm most certainly a Calvinist through and through (I think he was right), but none of these characterizations fit at all the way Calvinists view God and His character. Alas, they're just gross misperceptions and mischaracterizations.Why would someone believe in a God that hates His creation enough to send the majority to hell? That programs us like a bunch of robots? Who will never get any true love from us because true love is given freely and not programmed.
LOL! :)Why would this god even create us to begin with? So He could play games with us?
The interesting question is really, why do so many deliberately or possibly inadvertently misconstrue the Calvinist understanding of God's character? Well, obviously to create straw-man arguments. But like I said, many are not even aware of this.WHY are the lies of God's character so readily accepted by some? Interesting question...