Christ’s Post-Resurrection Appearances Were Materializations
JG: Materialized in human form, Christ appeared to those who had been closest to Him in life ... The fact Christ after his death upon earth appeared to his followers in material form has led you to the erroneous conclusion that His spirit re-entered His former physical body. In reality He made Himself visible in the same manner in which all spirits do so, namely by materialization of his spiritual body. (p. 351, 387)
WT: Jesus Christ ... his resurrection was “in the spirit,” to life in heaven. .... However, for 40 days after his resurrection Jesus appeared to his disciples on different occasions in various fleshly bodies, just as angels had appeared to men of ancient times. ((Insight on the Scriptures Vol. 2 p.786)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doctrines About the Trinity
The Trinity is a Human Creation
JG: You teach the union of three persons in one Godhead ... This is a piece of human fallacy and is an absurdity. (p.265) ... Christ taught a unipersonalist God ... He knows of no triune God of Whom the Catholic and other Christian denomonations teach. Only the Father is God. (p. 364)
WT: The reason the Bible does not clearly teach the Trinity doctrine is simple: It is not a Bible teaching. Had God been a Trinity, he would surely have made it clear so that Jesus and his disciples could have taught it to others. And that vital information would have been included in God’s inspired Word. It would not have been left to imperfect men to struggle with centuries later. (Watchtower 11/1/91 p.23)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doctrines About Hell
JG: A doctrine to which you cling with astonishing tenacity ... is that of an “eternal Hell.” ... This is a wholly mistaken, manmade idea. ... there is no authority in the bible to support your inhuman and untrue doctrine of an everlasting Hell. (p. 377, 379)
WT: Did Almighty God create such a place of torment? ... If the idea of roasting people in fire had never come into God’s heart, does it seem reasonable that he created a fiery hell for thse who do not serve him? (Paradise on Earth p.81)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions for Jehovah’s Witnesses
•Why would an organization that believes the Bible’s warnings about mediums, seances, and spiritism use a translation written by a spiritist to support its own Bible translation ? Why would the Watchtower Society knowingly embrace a translation of John 1:1 given by demonic spirits?
• Are doctrines of demons of Jehovah God? Was the "faithful slave" honest with you? Does God lie?
•Why would demons try to convince Greber that his beliefs were wrong, and convert him these doctrines, when Greber’s beliefs were those of apostate Christendom to begin with?
•Should you associate with an organization whose teachings agree with those taught by demons?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, For a few others who are ALSO quoted by the Watchtower as support for John 1:1 " a god"
They are not without support for this translation, however, but let's take a closer look at the precedents for translating, “and the Word was a god.” Devil is in the details?
Johannes Greber's New Testament obviously set a precedent for the Jehovah’s Witnesses, and their rendering of John 1:1 is almost identical.
Continuing on with the precedents for translating John 1:1 “…and the Word was a god,”
2) We also find the Watchtower Society quoting on page 5 of
The Word Who is He? According to John: “This reading is also found in the
New Testament in an Improved Version, published in London, England in 1808.”
But, We are directed to a footnote which reads, “The title page reads ‘The New Testament in An Improved Version, upon the basis of Archbishop Newcome’s New Translation with a Corrected Text, and Notes Critical and Explanatory. Published by a Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge and the Practice of Virtue, by the Distribution of Books—Unitarian.’”
Yes, the key word above is “Unitarian.” This is a teaching that Jesus was just an extraordinarily good man, nothing more.
Mr. Thomas Belsham, after Archbishop Newcome’s death, altered his text. He admitted to it. [See page 394,
Manual of Biblical Bibliography.]
This altered text dishonoring Archbishop Newcome’s careful scholarship also provided a basis for the
New World Translation’s “…and the Word was a god.” (see also the
Kingdom Interlinear Translation, page 1160, 1969 ed.)
Why would the Watchtower use as their guide a cult denying the biblical Christ, and guilty of altering a reputable biblical text?
------------------
A 3RD precedent for translating John 1:1,”…and the Word was a god” comes from the
3) Emphatic Diaglott by Benjamin Wilson. His translation actually reads “the LOGOS was God.” But he placed the words “a god” under “theos” in the Greek and English.
Mr. Wilson never studied biblical Greek in college. He was a follower of John Thomas, a proven false prophet by biblical definition, and the founder of the Christadelphians, a Christ-dishonoring cult.
Yes, the “precedents” for translating John 1:1 “…and the Word was a god” crumble away under close and honest scholarship.
Why would the Watchtower Society CHOOSE precedents that are false and even demonic? Why do they CHOOSE to ignore Greek Scholars who are reputable?
4) A Johnny come lately is- Jason Beduhn- Northern Arizona University ( in his book, Truth in Translation) whom the Watchtower is tickled to quote for John 1:1. word was divine or a god. Mr Beduhn's book speaks about bias. Yet, he is not without bias himself. I spoke with him directly on CARM. He believes that the Word was an "it". quote-
"How does God create in Genesis? He speaks words that make things come into existence. So the Word is God's creative power and plan and activity. It is not God himself, but it is not really totally separate from God either. It occupies a kind of ambiguous status."
Beduhn is a nice man and there are plenty of debates online to read between him and others. Grammatically, it technically could be translated either way. We need to look at context and I believe John 1:3 helps do that.
can also look to Apostolic Father's writings where it's quoted often, and the context is clearly not " a god" or "divine". - Simply impossible.
6) Abner Kneeland--
He had been a Universalist pastor-Kneeland became a freethinker and pantheist, saying that the Universalist's Christian God was "nothing more than a chimera of their own imagination". He later denounce all 4 gospels as untrue.
Ok - if you made it this far- Congratulations 
If you are a Jw and made it this far, I salute you, and ask you to please prayerfully question all things you have been taught. Do not be afraid- Just pray for His Truth.
Interesting side note- The Jws did worship Jesus until 1954.
If you are weary of Jws- print this out and show them.
Please bump it often ? It is very important.