How would you respond to Dr. Walvoord to this quote:
"Dr. Walvoord's summary statement is instructive.
It must be conceded that the advanced and detailed theology of pretribulationalism is not found in the Church Fathers, but neither is any other detailed or established exposition of premill. All eschatological views must rely on Scripture, not upon a precedent (or lack thereof) in church history."
Remember, the Church Fathers mostly taught some form of imminence of Jesus' coming.
"Dr. Walvoord's summary statement is instructive.
It must be conceded that the advanced and detailed theology of pretribulationalism is not found in the Church Fathers, but neither is any other detailed or established exposition of premill. All eschatological views must rely on Scripture, not upon a precedent (or lack thereof) in church history."
Remember, the Church Fathers mostly taught some form of imminence of Jesus' coming.
