Dialectical or Paradoxical pairs.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

J

Johann

Guest
EASTERN LITERATURE (biblical paradoxes)

This insight (i.e., that the Bible is an eastern book, not a western book) has been the most helpful to me personally as one who loves and trusts the Bible as God's Word. In trying to take the Bible seriously it became obvious that different texts reveal truth in selected, not systematic ways.
One inspired text cannot cancel or depreciate another inspired text!
Truth comes in knowing all Scripture (all Scripture, not just some, is inspired, cf. 2 Tim. 3:16-17).

Be careful of quoting a single passage (proof-texting)!

Most biblical truths (eastern literature) are presented in dialectical or paradoxical pairs (remember the NT authors, except Luke, are Hebrew thinkers, writing in common Greek).

Wisdom Literature and Poetic Literature (see SPECIAL TOPIC: HEBREW POETRY) present truth in parallel lines. The antithetical parallelism functions like the paradox. This synthetic parallelism functions like parallel passages. Somehow both are equally true! These paradoxes are painful to our cherished, simplistic, denominational, proof-texted traditions! Which of the following is true?

predestination or human free will (see SPECIAL TOPIC: ELECTION)

security of the believer or the need for perseverance (see SPECIAL TOPIC: PERSEVERANCE)

original sin or volitional sin (see SPECIAL TOPIC: THE FALL OF MANKIND)

Jesus as God or Jesus as man (cf. 1 John 3:1-4)

Jesus as equal with the Father or Jesus as subservient to the Father

Bible as God's Word or human authorship

sinlessness (perfectionism, cf. Romans 6) or sinning less

initial instantaneous justification and sanctification or progressive sanctification (see SPECIAL TOPIC: SANCTIFICATION)

justification by faith (Romans 4) or justification confirmed by works (cf. James 2:14-26)
Christian freedom (cf. Rom. 14:1-23; 1 Cor. 8:1-13; 10:23-33) or Christian responsibility (cf. Gal. 5:16-21; Eph. 4:1; see SPECIAL TOPIC: CHRISTIAN FREEDOM vs.

CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY)

God's transcendence or His immanence

God as ultimately unknowable (i.e., Ecclesiastes) or knowable in Scripture and Christ (John 1:1-4; 14:8-11)

the kingdom of God as present or future consummation (see SPECIAL TOPIC: THE KINGDOM OF GOD)
repentance as a gift of God (cf. Acts 11:18; Rom. 2:4; 2 Tim. 2:25) or repentance as a mandated response for salvation (cf. Mark 1:15; Acts 20:21; see SPECIAL

TOPIC: REPENTANCE [NT])
the OT is permanent or the OT has passed away and is null and void (cf. Matt. 5:17-19 vs. Matt. 5:21-48; Romans 7 vs. Galatians 3; and the book of Hebrews); see SPECIAL TOPIC: PAUL'S VIEWS OF THE MOSAIC LAW
believers are servants/slaves or children/heirs
Which of Paul's images for salvation are true?
adoption
sanctification
justification
redemption
glorification
predestination
reconciliation
"Both. . .And" is a better theological model than "Either. . .Or." Doctrines come in "constellations of truth," not which star is brightest" or "which one do I like the best"?!

Three books that have helped me in this area are
G. B. Caird, The Language and Imagery of the Bible, which describes the many literary aspects of Eastern Literature (i.e., poetry, parable, sarcasm, hyperbole, as well as paradox.
Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart, How To Read the Bible For All Its Worth, which analyzes the different genres found in Scripture and how to interpret them
John H. Walton, Ancient Israelite Literature in Its Cultural Context
SPECIAL TOPIC: HEBREW POETRY

SPECIAL TOPIC: PROPHECY (OT)

SPECIAL TOPIC: WISDOM LITERATURE

SPECIAL TOPIC: HISTORICAL NARRATIVE

SPECIAL TOPIC: HISTORIOGRAPHY

 

GodsGrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2017
14,082
7,310
113
Tuscany
Faith
Christian
Country
Italy
EASTERN LITERATURE (biblical paradoxes)

This insight (i.e., that the Bible is an eastern book, not a western book) has been the most helpful to me personally as one who loves and trusts the Bible as God's Word. In trying to take the Bible seriously it became obvious that different texts reveal truth in selected, not systematic ways.
One inspired text cannot cancel or depreciate another inspired text!
Truth comes in knowing all Scripture (all Scripture, not just some, is inspired, cf. 2 Tim. 3:16-17).

Be careful of quoting a single passage (proof-texting)!
I'm surprised no one has replied to this.
Proof texting: How else do we support what we believe?
I do consistently state that the bible is an entire concept and cannot be broken down into bits...
but when making a case we do need to post scripture.

Is there another way?
Most biblical truths (eastern literature) are presented in dialectical or paradoxical pairs (remember the NT authors, except Luke, are Hebrew thinkers, writing in common Greek).

Wisdom Literature and Poetic Literature (see SPECIAL TOPIC: HEBREW POETRY) present truth in parallel lines. The antithetical parallelism functions like the paradox. This synthetic parallelism functions like parallel passages. Somehow both are equally true! These paradoxes are painful to our cherished, simplistic, denominational, proof-texted traditions! Which of the following is true?
Will take the "test"...
predestination or human free will (see SPECIAL TOPIC: ELECTION)
Human free will.
security of the believer or the need for perseverance (see SPECIAL TOPIC: PERSEVERANCE)
Need for perseverance.
original sin or volitional sin (see SPECIAL TOPIC: THE FALL OF MANKIND)
Original sin although I'm not sure what volitional sin is except that volitional means that I want to.
Jesus as God or Jesus as man (cf. 1 John 3:1-4)
Jesus is God.
Jesus as equal with the Father or Jesus as subservient to the Father
Equal with the Father.
Bible as God's Word or human authorship
God's Word, but I really understand it more as men being INSPIRED by God.
sinlessness (perfectionism, cf. Romans 6) or sinning less
Sinning less.
initial instantaneous justification and sanctification or progressive sanctification (see SPECIAL TOPIC: SANCTIFICATION)
Progressive sanctification.
Instantaneous Justification.
justification by faith (Romans 4) or justification confirmed by works (cf. James 2:14-26)
Christian freedom (cf. Rom. 14:1-23; 1 Cor. 8:1-13; 10:23-33) or Christian responsibility (cf. Gal. 5:16-21; Eph. 4:1; see SPECIAL TOPIC: CHRISTIAN FREEDOM vs.
Both. We are justified by faith alone...
it is confirmed by works.
CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY)

God's transcendence or His immanence
Transendence
God as ultimately unknowable (i.e., Ecclesiastes) or knowable in Scripture and Christ (John 1:1-4; 14:8-11)
Knowable as far as scripture allows.
the kingdom of God as present or future consummation (see SPECIAL TOPIC: THE KINGDOM OF GOD)
Both. The Kingdom starts here.
repentance as a gift of God (cf. Acts 11:18; Rom. 2:4; 2 Tim. 2:25) or repentance as a mandated response for salvation (cf. Mark 1:15; Acts 20:21; see SPECIAL
Mandated response for salvation.

TOPIC: REPENTANCE [NT])
the OT is permanent or the OT has passed away and is null and void (cf. Matt. 5:17-19 vs. Matt. 5:21-48; Romans 7 vs. Galatians 3; and the book of Hebrews); see SPECIAL TOPIC: PAUL'S VIEWS OF THE MOSAIC LAW

No covenant abolished the previous, but changed it in some way or made it better.
believers are servants/slaves or children/heirs
Children/heirs
Which of Paul's images for salvation are true?
adoption
sanctification
justification
redemption
glorification
predestination
reconciliation
All including predestination but not as the reformed understand it.
"Both. . .And" is a better theological model than "Either. . .Or." Doctrines come in "constellations of truth," not which star is brightest" or "which one do I like the best"?!
Both...And
Three books that have helped me in this area are
G. B. Caird, The Language and Imagery of the Bible, which describes the many literary aspects of Eastern Literature (i.e., poetry, parable, sarcasm, hyperbole, as well as paradox.
Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart, How To Read the Bible For All Its Worth, which analyzes the different genres found in Scripture and how to interpret them
John H. Walton, Ancient Israelite Literature in Its Cultural Context
SPECIAL TOPIC: HEBREW POETRY

SPECIAL TOPIC: PROPHECY (OT)

SPECIAL TOPIC: WISDOM LITERATURE

SPECIAL TOPIC: HISTORICAL NARRATIVE

SPECIAL TOPIC: HISTORIOGRAPHY

Wonder what others would respond....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann
J

Johann

Guest
I'm surprised no one has replied to this.
Proof texting: How else do we support what we believe?
I do consistently state that the bible is an entire concept and cannot be broken down into bits...
but when making a case we do need to post scripture.

Is there another way?
Nessuno è interessato a ciò che pubblico, il che rende tutto più facile per me. @GodsGrace

Shalom.
J.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: GodsGrace

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
36,665
24,011
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
(remember the NT authors, except Luke, are Hebrew thinkers, writing in common Greek).
Do you see this of Paul also? I've more thought of him as thinking in the same Greek he was writing. Am I incorrect about that?

Much love!