.
330) 1Tim 6:20 . . Avoid impious and vain babblings, and oppositions of
science falsely so called:
Not all science is false. The kind we need to be wary of typically shows up in
informal group discussions, i.e. forums, bull sessions, and brain storming;
wherein people shoot from the lip without really knowing what they're
talking about.
For example: one day at work a man in the break room said he believes it's
arrogant to assume there is no other intelligent life in the universe but that
found on earth. You know why he said that? Because he heard it said first by
someone he admires, ergo: he was perpetuating a logical fallacy in the form
of a credible opinion.
* On June 28, 2024, The US Supreme Court overturned a long held opinion,
the so-called Chevron Deference Doctrine, which was basically an argument
from authority, i.e. a logical fallacy which supposes that someone's position,
or their credentials, makes their views more important and/or more likely to
be correct than the views of lesser folks.
In a nutshell; just because someone is high up on the "expert" totem pole
does not eo ipso make them right and/or worth repeating. Caveat Lector.
_
330) 1Tim 6:20 . . Avoid impious and vain babblings, and oppositions of
science falsely so called:
Not all science is false. The kind we need to be wary of typically shows up in
informal group discussions, i.e. forums, bull sessions, and brain storming;
wherein people shoot from the lip without really knowing what they're
talking about.
For example: one day at work a man in the break room said he believes it's
arrogant to assume there is no other intelligent life in the universe but that
found on earth. You know why he said that? Because he heard it said first by
someone he admires, ergo: he was perpetuating a logical fallacy in the form
of a credible opinion.
* On June 28, 2024, The US Supreme Court overturned a long held opinion,
the so-called Chevron Deference Doctrine, which was basically an argument
from authority, i.e. a logical fallacy which supposes that someone's position,
or their credentials, makes their views more important and/or more likely to
be correct than the views of lesser folks.
In a nutshell; just because someone is high up on the "expert" totem pole
does not eo ipso make them right and/or worth repeating. Caveat Lector.
_