Yes, ma'am! I am trying, but I have to love as God directs me to and fills my heart, not based on what you think love is.Then start doing so.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, ma'am! I am trying, but I have to love as God directs me to and fills my heart, not based on what you think love is.Then start doing so.
I can understand how you feel, as I have felt this way many times on this forum. If I have done this to you, please forgive me. It was not my intent.I've been treated like an object here rather than a person -- let alone a disciple of Christ. And I'm really really sick of it.
Pardon me, but I don't think God drives you to ignore people's relationship with Christ, to rely on hypocritical reasoning, or ignore facts.Yes, ma'am! I am trying, but I have to love as God directs me to and fills my heart, not based on what you think love is.
I can understand how you feel, as I have felt this way many times on this forum. If I have done this to you, please forgive me. It was not my intent.
Hopefully, I will do as God directs me. That's the best that I can offer. :)Pardon me, but I don't think God drives you to ignore people's relationship with Christ, to rely on hypocritical reasoning, or ignore facts.
That is the sinful part of you speaking. We all have it. Btu we also need to fight it and walk in Christ's ways.
Are you going to acknowledge my relationship with Christ?
Or are you going to continue to treat me as an object that you need to "save" because you know "better" than I?
An apology where you have zero intention of changing your ways isn't an actual apology.Hopefully, I will do as God directs me. That's the best that I can offer. :)
My dear, when someone holds out an olive branch to you, it's probably best not to whack them in the face with it. Just saying. :)An apology where you have zero intention of changing your ways isn't an actual apology.
Until you literally say "yes, you should ask Mike and trust him about what Protestant teach", then there's no point in discussing Lynn because your very epistemological methodology is groundless and fails every possible test from the get-go.
But did you really offer an olive branch?My dear, when someone holds out an olive branch to you, it's probably best not to whack them in the face with it. Just saying. :)
God knows my heart, JD, and it was sincerely offered. This is not to say that I am going to do everything you want me to do or in the way you think I should do it. Like I said, God will direct me. If I do as He directs, then we will both benefit, don't you think?But did you really offer an olive branch?
Or, despite your words, is it your intention to continue treating me as an object rather than acknowledging my relationship with Christ?
Do you intend to keep treating me as an object to be "saved" by you?God knows my heart, JD, and it was sincerely offered. This is not to say that I am going to do everything you want me to do or in the way you think I should do it. Like I said, God will direct me. If I do as He directs, then we will both benefit, don't you think?
Thank you for this well thought out post.Maybe not "trust" 100%, but at least research what's he's/Mike's saying for yourself. Why is someone being an ex of something automatically mean they're wrong/untruthful? The person who left isn't always disgruntled, perhaps, just thinks differently for some reason.
And this could go both ways, what if what they're saying is true/right, if after you've researched it?
You brought up an ex-Protestant before; why wouldn't that be any different (which I get is what you're saying, logically)?
Do you intend to keep treating me as an object to be "saved" by you?
Then start treating me as such.I don't think of people who need to be saved as objects. I think of them as people Jesus loves enough to have suffered immensely and died for....
Then start treating me as such.
Thank you for this well thought out post.
Axe grinding makes someone/something a bad source.
Being an ex-whatever doesn't automatically make someone a bad source or a good one. It's just there past.
To figure things out for yourself: naturally, a person should verify things for themselves. That's what I've been saying this entire time. Seek the facts, and from the best sources in the best ways.
A whistle blower and an axe grinder are two different things.I guess what I'm saying is, is that being an axe-grinder doesn't automatically negate what one is saying is untruthful. It could untruthful, but only because it's untruthful, not because they're axe grinding.
Someone could want to spite someone, or get revenge, by spilling the truth. Doesn't make them untruthful. Does that make them a bad source/disgruntled/negative person, it could, but it could not too. One does not automatically equal the other; so it could, could not.
Are you saying that whistle-blowers shouldn't blow the whistle, if they're disgruntled/a-bad-source, or whistle-blowers shouldn't blow the whistle because they're untruthful (which means they're not really whistle-blowers)?
And yes I agree, seek the facts, and figure things out for yourself.
One of the most valuable things I can offer anyone is my prayers. I have been praying for you, and I pray now that you will receive all that God has for you.
Thus far you have gone to great lengths to minimise any impact @Prayer Warrior may have in this thread by casting aspersions on her, and her source. But I note that not once have you denied the truthfulness of what she is quoting. Is what she quoted am accurate description of the ceremonies, or don't you know because you haven't gone through them?A whistle blower and an axe grinder are two different things.
What makes a person an axe-grinder is the hugely biased agenda and the willingness to put a huge skew on information. That's why their intrinsically such a problematic source.
A person can be critical of someone / something else, but still not be an axe-grinder.
Because she and her husband have been there, done that, and unless I am shown different, I believe her testimony. Now you can disparage her all you like... But the question is.. Is her testimony wrong, and if so, how? She goes into great detail of her experience in the temple... Vetted and approved by those in charge... And her story is similar to others I have heard who are still Mormons. So... Why the angst against prayer warrior and the writer of the book?Now.. why do you trust her?