bbyrd009
Groper
- Nov 30, 2016
- 33,943
- 12,082
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States Minor Outlying Islands
we're talking Scripture here mjr, or at least i amYou want to follow after men, you want to hear what you want to hear
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
we're talking Scripture here mjr, or at least i amYou want to follow after men, you want to hear what you want to hear
Well ets put it this way, the catholics all agree there church is the right one and yet they are wrong, can be said for every religon on this earth, look at5 all the wars that where fought by men in agreement, yet they too where wrong, the only ones we need to agree with.we're talking Scripture here mjr, or at least i am
this bit"Why do you keep calling me 'Lord, Lord,' but don't do what I tell you?
why not put it in a reply to the Scripture we were talking about instead of alla time deflecting mjrWell ets put it this way
"bc i'd rather argue with Jesus" lolthis bit
Which part, if you spoke English some times I might know what you are talking about. We are talking about mens lives here, and to you it just seems to be a big joke.why not put it in a reply to the Scripture we were talking about instead of alla time deflecting mjr
i'm not laughing mjr.Which part, if you spoke English some times I might know what you are talking about. We are talking about mens lives here, and to you it just seems to be a big joke.
anything before this one would work fine i guessshould be pretty obvious? You have put yourself in the context of those vv, right.
you say "don't listen to ppl," but "In the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter will be established."
and two or three--or i can bring ten if you like--have been brought against your matter here, that you either can't or won't answer.
how will you stand in the fire, if you can't even answer them? Bc i don't think you will be allowed to change the subject then wadr
Please specify so we are on the same page, im not good at guessing games.anything before this one would work fine i guess
Our morals that you think only come from your God himself is not true. Morality is something that has grown and expanded among many different cultures.
So my question to you is, are you sure your God is up to the moral challenge himself?
Who says the universe doesn't have a creator who designed our innate moral sense? Now who says that this creator who made this sense in all animals is your creator? You've yet to provided evidence that your creator is in fact the one who designed this universe.What you are describing is nothing more than subjective personal preferences, which are certainly no gauge of right or wrong, good or evil. Morality requires an objective standard, which does not exist in a godless universe. Again, an atheist who is concerned about morality is simply inconsistent with his/her professed worldview. Inconsistent atheists are actually proof of the following:
Rom 2:14 For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law.
Rom 2:15 They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them...
That's absurd simply on a philosophical level. God, the creator of all that exists, is the author and source of morality. There is no valid "challenge" to the one who is the very source of right and wrong.
Who says the universe doesn't have a creator who designed our innate moral sense? Now who says that this creator who made this sense in all animals is your creator? You've yet to provided evidence that your creator is in fact the one who designed this universe.
Honestly, you can't show in the Bible that it pertains information leading humanity to know that your God is our universe's creator. You have nothing, in fact your God struggles to know information outside of his own people's territory, like Australia, and yet he's the creator of the universe?Uh oh... another logical fallacy. I answered your initial question and now you want to move the goalposts. Allow me to remind you:
"Name one thing you can do morally with God that I can't do morally without." Meh
Despite your attempt at a red herring, my answer remains the same. "With God" you have an objective standard, which is binding on all. "Without God" you have nothing but ever changing subjective personal preferences, which are binding on no one. Again, 'morality' without God is part and parcel of an inconsistent worldview.
Honestly, you can't show in the Bible that it pertains information leading humanity to know that your God is our universe's creator. You have nothing, in fact your God struggles to know information outside of his own people's territory, like Australia, and yet he's the creator of the universe?
I mean come on! Let go of superstition & and be free.
I said "Meh" to hell.Again, your initial challenge was:
"Name one thing you can do morally with God that I can't do morally without."
And my answer was:
""With God" you have an objective standard, which is binding on all. "Without God" you have nothing but ever changing subjective personal preferences, which are binding on no one. Again, 'morality' without God is part and parcel of an inconsistent worldview."
I'm struggling to find a relevant response in your recent replies. Care to directly engage the topic at hand? Or is it just easier to change the subject in order to slip out from under the weight of my answer?
I said "Meh" to hell.
I would think that someone who hold's a moral standard by belief alone is playing a risky game. Belief doesn't guarantee you an objective standard, because beliefs are subjective & experience based.Again, your initial challenge was:
"Name one thing you can do morally with God that I can't do morally without."
And my answer was:
""With God" you have an objective standard, which is binding on all. "Without God" you have nothing but ever changing subjective personal preferences, which are binding on no one. Again, 'morality' without God is part and parcel of an inconsistent worldview."
I'm struggling to find a relevant response in your recent replies. Care to directly engage the topic at hand? Or is it just easier to change the subject in order to slip out from under the weight of my answer?
not just factual information, but a declaration from a reliable higher authority would also suffice you think?I would think that someone who hold's a moral standard by belief alone is playing a risky game. Belief doesn't guarantee you an objective standard, because beliefs are subjective & experience based.
That's why so many Christian's hold different moral's & opinions, because it's all a matter of interpreting the Bible in light of personal revelation.
Christian's aren't the only one's who play dice with their moral's, anyone who holds a moral system by belief alone would be effected by the same dilemma.
Say I tell you homosexuality is wrong, is it wrong because you believe it's wrong? Or is it wrong because you know it's wrong? Well if you believe it's wrong, you have no evidence (It's just a personal belief)
If you know it's wrong, you'll be able to prove it's wrong based on factual information.