That's not what God's Word says
That is precisely what Galatians 3:16-19 says.
Hebrews 10:9
Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.
(God said He would make a New Covenant - see Jeremiah 31:31-34)
If a new covenant nullifies the promises of a covenant that has already been ratified, then that would mean that God is a liar who breaks His promises, but that is not what that verse is saying.
WHERE did Jesus teach that when one sins they have to go make an animal sacrifice to cover their sin???
Jesus being sinless is a basic Christian doctrine and it is by the Mosaic Law that we have knowledge of what sin is (Romans 3:20), which means the he set a sinless example of how to walk in obedience to it.
If you are going to follow the "torah" then you must reject the New Covenant and liver under the law of Moses rather than the Law of Christ which is what the New Testament teaches
Again, Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Torah by word and by example, so I don't see a good reason to think that the Law of Christ is something other than or contrary to what Christ taught. Moreover, Christ did not establish the New Covenant for the purpose of undermining anything that he spent his ministry teaching, but rather the New Covenant still involves following the Torah (Jeremiah 31:33).
Jesus specifically said the law and the prophets stopped at John the Baptist's ministry...
Luke 16:16
The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
Reckon Jesus got it wrong and He forgot to teach we are required to follow the Low of Moses to be saved?
Neither Jesus nor John taught people stop repenting because the Torah has ended now that they've come, but just the opposite, the Gospel of the Kingdom being preached since that time calls for our repentance from our disobedience to the Torah. In Luke 16:17, Jesus said that it would be easier for heaven and earth to disappear than for the least part to disappear from the Torah, so he did not think that it had already ended. Moreover, in use 16:18, Jesus continued to teach obedience to the Torah.
Jesus saves us from our sin, so while we do not earn our salvation as the result of our obedience to the Torah, Jesus graciously teaching us to be a doer of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being a doer of it. In Titus 2:11-13, our salvation is described as being trained by grace to do what is godly, righteous, and good, and to renounce doing what is ungodly, so obeying the Torah has nothing to do with trying to earn our salvation, but rather God graciously teaching us to be a doer of it is part of His gift of salvation. Again, Psalms 110:29-30 describes the one and only way of salvation by grace through faith.
Those subscribing to this nonsense are confused.... you still doing animal sacrifices for salvation?
That's what the torah demands.
The Bible contains many parallel statements that are two ways of expressing the same thought, so it is not nonsense for 1 Corinthians 9:21 to be equating the the Law of God with the Law of Christ. God gave the Torah and Christ is God, so it is straightforwardly the Law of Christ. In Deuteronomy 5:31-33, Moses wrote down everything that God commanded hi without depart from it, so the Torah is the Law of God, which is why it is referred to as being the Law of God in verses like Nehemiah 8:1-8, Ezra 7:6-12, and Luke 2:22-23. By all means, please quote where the Torah states that the way to earn our salvation is by doing animal sacrifices.
Actually the Galatians turned away from Jesus and went back to the law of Moses... and that caused them to fall from grace meaning they were no longer saved and had become corrupt.
It is absurd to think that someone can turn away from Jesus by obeying what he spent his ministry teaching or to think that someone can turn away from God's word made flesh by obeying God's word. You also did not address the absurdity of you trying to turn Galatians against believing the Gospel of Christ or of interpreting Psalms 119:29 as him wanting God to be gracious to him by teaching him how to fall from grace. It is also absurd that being a doer of the Torah causes someone to lose their salvation from not being a doer of the Torah. If you interpret the Bible as saying things that are completely absurd, then you should rethink your interpretation.
If one is to follow the toah, they MUST declare Paul to be a false teacher and ignore him and teach others to ignore him too.
That is false because it is completely unnecessary to interpret Paul in a way that turns him against obeying the Torah. If you think Paul spoke against obeying the Torah and you want to maintain the position that he was a servant of God, then you only option is to conclude that you must have misunderstood him, or if you think he spoke against obeying the Torah and you want to maintain your position that your interpretation is correct, then your only option is to conclude that he was a false prophet, but Deuteronomy 13 does not leave room to hold both the positions that Paul was a servant of God and that he spoke against obeying the Torah.