US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

[Truth7t7]

I wasn’t talking about you

Of course you were responding to me in post #388

(Quote RLT63 Post #388 Below)

"Why do they feel the need to dominate Christian Forums?"

 

[RLT63]

Of course you were responding to me in post #388

(Quote RLT63 Post #388 Below)

"Why do they feel the need to dominate Christian Forums?"

I was talking about @TinMan . I wasn’t talking ABOUT you. I was talking TO you

 

[Truth7t7]

I was talking about @TinMan . I wasn’t talking ABOUT you. I was talking TO you

Of course you were responding to me in post #388

(Quote RLT63 Post #388 Below)

"Why do they feel the need to dominate Christian Forums?"

 

[L.A.M.B.]

 

[ButterflyJones]

Why do they feel the need to dominate Christian Forums?

They aren't dominating this forum. They continue because we pay them attention.

Remember the article that came out a few years ago? An expose' about the Satanic nature of Congress and some members even being Satanic?
Google, Congress Satanic.
Wow! Yet, not surprising.

 

[RLT63]

They aren't dominating this forum. They continue because we pay them attention.

Remember the article that came out a few years ago? An expose' about the Satanic nature of Congress and some members even being Satanic?
Google, Congress Satanic.
Wow! Yet, not surprising.

I’m on another Christian forum and there are more atheists and agnostics there than Christians and even among the Christians if you say anything critical of evolution you better be ready for the backlash. I just don’t understand why people who have other beliefs feel the need to try to dominate Christian forums. I have never been interested in posting on an atheist forum.

 

[RLT63]

Of course you were responding to me in post #388

(Quote RLT63 Post #388 Below)

"Why do they feel the need to dominate Christian Forums?"

Again I was asking you a question about other posters. I wasn’t saying you want to dominate the forum. I’m sorry you got the wrong impression from my post.

 

[TinMan]

It was a different book. The story is false

Here is the page that makes the book "pornographic" Well I'm scandalized.

 

[ButterflyJones]

I’m on another Christian forum and there are more atheists and agnostics there than Christians and even among the Christians if you say anything critical of evolution you better be ready for the backlash. I just don’t understand why people who have other beliefs feel the need to try to dominate Christian forums. I have never been interested in posting on an atheist forum.

Hard to imagine a Christian would believe in the theory of Evolution.

Not everyone who identifies as Christian on their registration and profile are actually Christian. They lie about that identity to gain access to those areas a community designates as for Christians only.

And sure enough they prove themselves liars post after post when they advocate for everything that is averse to our faith.

It's a hobby. And the sign of a life vacant of happiness.

I've lurked in atheist forums to see what they discuss. The number one topic? God, the Bible, Jesus and Christians faith and practice.

 

[RLT63]

Hard to imagine a Christian would believe in the theory of Evolution.

Not everyone who identifies as Christian on their registration and profile are actually Christian. They lie about that identity to gain access to those areas a community designates as for Christians only.

And sure enough they prove themselves liars post after post when they advocate for everything that is averse to our faith.

It's a hobby. And the sign of a life vacant of happiness.

I've lurked in atheist forums to see what they discuss. The number one topic? God, the Bible, Jesus and Christians faith and practice.

That’s interesting. There are quite a lot of Christians who believe in Theistic Evolution.

 

[ButterflyJones]

That’s interesting. There are quite a lot of Christians who believe in Theistic Evolution.

Theistic evolution isn't Darwinian evolution.

 

[RLT63]

Theistic evolution isn't Darwinian evolution.

I don’t believe in abiogenesis and I don’t believe that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor so I couldn’t agree with Theistic Evolution

 

[TinMan]

That’s not the only one. It also shows two young girls topless.

Have you read it?

 

[RLT63]

Have you read it?

I don’t care to read a book that makes a mockery of Anne Frank’s work.

 

[TinMan]

I don’t care to read a book that makes a mockery of Anne Frank’s work.

so you don't have a clue what is in the book.

There is no depiction of topless girls.

There is no pornography.

 

[RLT63]

so you don't have a clue what is in the book.

There is no depiction of topless girls.

There is no pornography.

Have you read the book? Doesn’t it portray Frank as a lesbian?
And what happened to your claim that The Diary of Anne Frank had been banned?
It was a perverted novel about Anne Frank and claiming the Diary of Anne Frank had been banned was a hoax. Completely dishonest

 

[TinMan]

Have you read the book?

Yes I have. No topless girls. No pornography

 

[RLT63]

Yes I have. No topless girls. No pornography

If you’ve read the book you knew all along that The Diary of Anne Frank had not been banned and you falsely made that claim and sarcastically asked what was pornagraphic about The Diary of Anne Frank. You’ve been completely dishonest about this and participated in this hoax. About the banned book:
“This week has certainly been no exception to that rule, with the Associated Press among the numerous media outlets that have distorted a Florida high school’s decision to remove from their library a book that was very loosely based on the Diary of Anne Frank on the grounds that it minimized the Holocaust and depicted Frank as a young lesbian girl who fantasized about seeing women’s breasts.”
Good for them for taking this out of kids libraries.

 

[RLT63]

Maybe you can tell us just what is pornographic about the Diary of Anne Frank.

Posts like this were completely dishonest if you have read the book that has been banned and knew all along that the claim that the Diary of Anne Frank had been banned was a complete fabrication. So have you read the book and been dishonest all this time or did you just say you’ve read the book to make a point and you were dishonest about that? Which one is it?

 

[RLT63]

Here is the page that makes the book "pornographic" Well I'm scandalized.
View attachment 34393

The book at one point shows the protagonist walking in a park, enchanted by female nude statues, and later proposing to a friend that they show each other their breasts.- according to the article I posted