Yep. but hard data is hard data and the reporting is backed by multiple sources. So unless you believe that almost teh entire health industry is oinvolved in a massive cover-up you are just being paranoid and listening to people who have anecdotal evidence but cannot give hard research to back their claims.
And you would expect that more would die. Why? Because most of the citizens have been jabbed!!!! But apart from forensic study of those who died shortly after a jab, we only have circumstantial evidence And most of those who died shortly after a jab were elderly with pre existing underlying conditions.
Hydroxyc

roquine, ah yes! the famnous debunked reports!
1. HCQ is an anti parasitic, not an antiviral. It is ineffective against viruses. That would be like taking a jock itch medication for heart disease!
2. It showed some efficacy in the tripak treatment and only in C-19 cases caught within the first few days. Teh other treatments were an antiinflammatory and corticosteroid! It is the antiinflammatory and steroid that reduced the symptoms and not the hcq. That is why it was stopped worldwide.
3. If all the info is censored- how do you know about it???? Where did y9ou get it? How do we know you are not stretching the truth for your own agenda.
Lets get some things clear.
1. I am not a pro C-19 vaccine guy. I am not an anti C-19 vaccine guy either.
2. I believe each individual with conulting with their medical professional needs to make their won decisions.
3. All medications (even aspirin and tylenol) have side effects. The more dangerous the illness, the more virulent the medication to counter it, hence more potential side effects.
4. People need to wiegh th erisk/benefit ratio for themselves.
5. C-19 vaccine is no different. When the shots came out, there was a list of many potential side effects known. People need to weigh the potential benefit to the potential risk for themsleves.